The Importance of gender Across Cultures in Ethical Decision-making

319 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Predictors, consequence, and measurement of ethical judgments: Review and meta-analysis (2012, unknown): “Some attribute these differences to socialization (Marta et al., 2004; Roxas and Stoneback, 2004).”
Gender differences in customer expectations and perceptions of corporate social responsibility (2016, background): “Besides, many authors have also stated that gender does not always influence the ethicality of business behaviour (McNichols and Zimmerer, 1985; Robin and Babin, 1997; Sankaran and Bui, 2003) and decision-making (Fritzsche, 1988; Roxas and Stoneback, 2004).”
Gender Differences in Double Standards (2008, background): “The gender socialization approach argues that males and females have distinctive different values and traits due to gender creating different moral orientations and resulting in different decisions and practices (Kohlberg, 1984; Roxas and Stoneback, 2004).”
Societal-Level Versus Individual-Level Predictions of Ethical Behavior: A 48-Society Study of Collectivism and Individualism (2013, result): “A definitive answer to this question has yet to be found given the mixed results of cross-national values and ethics studies (e.g., Choi and Chen, 2006; Ma 2010; Roxas and Stoneback 2004; Schwartz and Rubel-Lifschitz 2009).”