The Measurement Equivalence of Web-Based and Paper-and-Pencil Measures of Transformational Leadership

By Michael S. Cole, A. Bedeian, H. S. Feild. 2006

108 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f26405660994b94401e30cd5ac0b31b7358f3965

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Heike Bruch
2. Michael S. Cole
3. B. Vogel
4. A. Bedeian
5. Boas Shamir
6. Thomas W. H. Ng
7. D. van Knippenberg
8. Bruce J. Avolio

In Social Psychology

1. Heike Bruch
2. Michael S. Cole
3. B. Vogel
4. Boas Shamir
5. A. Bedeian
6. Bruce J. Avolio
7. Thomas W. H. Ng
8. W. Gardner

Citations in the corpus

• Social distance as a moderator of the effects of transformational leadership: Both neutralizer and enhancer (2009, background): “When evaluating cross-language measurement equivalence, researchers have argued that equivalence is supported when a measure’s factor loadings (metric equivalence) are found equivalent across groups (Cole et al., 2006).”
• Linking leader behavior and leadership consensus to team performance: Integrating direct consensus and dispersion models of group composition (2011, background): “Cole et al. / The Leadership Quarterly 22 (2011) 383–398”
• Energy at work: A measurement validation and linkage to unit effectiveness. (2012, methodology): “We conducted measurement equivalence tests to ensure that the measures were comparable across modes of administration (Cole et al., 2006).”