When static media promote active learning: annotated illustrations versus narrated animations in multimedia instruction.

By Richard E. Mayer, Mary Hegarty, Susan E. Mayer, Julie Campbell. Journal of experimental psychology. Applied, 2005

474 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f224b064d07ee8aaefbd379b39c2ecb20bf1daf5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Safety Research

Citations in the corpus

Visualization Rhetoric: Framing Effects in Narrative Visualization (2011, background): “To simplify complex ideas in a visual representation it is often helpful to keep distracting or irrelevant information to a minimum (e.g. [28]).”
Towards a Framework for Attention Cueing in Instructional Animations: Guidelines for Research and Design (2009, background): “Although a review by Tversky et al. (2002) found little evidence that animations were superior to static visualizations (see also Mayer et al. 2005), a meta-analysis by Höffler and Leutner (2007) indicated that under some conditions animations may produce better learning than static visualizations.”
Does animation enhance learning? A meta-analysis (2016, background): “No Mayer et al. (2005) expe 2 0.364 Conceptual Remember Mechanics Light Different Yes Iconic repr.”
Can Dynamic Visualizations Improve Middle School Students' Understanding of Energy in Photosynthesis? (2012, methodology): “…ideas, can overcome the potential for deceptive clarity in visualizations (Chiu & Linn, 2011; Linn et al., 2010; Linn & Eylon, 2011) and reduce the possible confusions associated with dynamic visualizations addressed in previous research (Mayer et al., 2005; Morrison & Tversky, 2001; Rieber, 1989).”
Spatial Ability: Its Influence on Learning with Visualizations—a Meta-Analytic Review (2010, result): “The suggestion to use dynamic visualizations for learners with low spatial ability, on the other hand, may sound controversial at first—but this finding could be one perfectly good reason for the many different findings concerning static pictures versus animations in the past (e.g., Hoffler and Leut”