DECOMPOSITION OF INFLECTED WORDS IN A SECOND LANGUAGE
By Kathleen Neubauer, Harald Clahsen. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 2009
126 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ae65abf715ff3b9b653564db6359d5dff45d2223
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Claudia Felser
- Harald Clahsen
- Annie Tremblay
- Caitlin E. Coughlin
- Kathleen Neubauer
- Jon Andoni Duñabeitia
- Emmanuel Keuleers
- Joanna Morris
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Caitlin E. Coughlin
- Harald Clahsen
- Claudia Felser
- Annie Tremblay
- Kathleen Neubauer
- Jon Andoni Duñabeitia
- Emmanuel Keuleers
- Joanna Morris
Citations in the corpus
- Morphological Structure in Native and Nonnative Language Processing (2010, background): “To examine whether the different frequency effects in the L1 and L2 were due to differences in speed of processing, Neubauer and Clahsen examined a subgroup of “fast” L2 responders who were matched to the L1 group in terms of overall response times across conditions. The results were parallel to tho”
- Fast morphological effects in first and second language word recognition (2011, background): “Recall that Neubauer and Clahsen (2009) found that stem priming with regular past participles (workedwork) was eliminated in L2, while priming with irregular forms remained stable (taught-teach).”
- Brain Potentials Reveal Discrete Stages of L2 Grammatical Learning (2010, background): “…with research suggesting that formulaic chunks play a role in L2 learners' grammatical development (e.g., Myles et al., 1998; Wong Fillmore, 1976; Wray, 2002; Zobl, 1998) and that L2 learners do not decompose morphologically complex words (Neubauer & Clahsen, 2009; Silva & Clahsen, 2008).”
- SOME NOTES ON THE SHALLOW STRUCTURE HYPOTHESIS (2017, background): “As more experimental studies on L2morphology became available, L1/L2 differences in morphological processing also became apparent, however (e.g., Clahsen & Neubauer, 2010; Neubauer & Clahsen, 2009; Silva & Clahsen, 2008).”
- Proficiency and working memory based explanations for nonnative speakers’ sensitivity to agreement in sentence processing (2012, result): “In line with these findings, using lexical decision and masked priming experiments, Neubauer and Clahsen (2009) found that advanced Polish L2 learners of German showed frequency effects for both regularly (e.g., gespielt “played”) and irregularly (e.g., gelaufen “run”) inflected words, whereas…”