Lexical dynamics for low-frequency complex words: A regression study across tasks and modalities

196 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Productivity and priming: Morphemic decomposition in Arabic (2011, unknown): “…of a given predictor are evaluated given (a) that other predictors are in the model and (b) that they are held constant. participants, prime type, and target items as crossed random effects (Baayen, Davidson, & Bates, 2008; Baayen, Tweedie, & Schreuder, 2002; Bates, 2005; Bates & Sarkar, 2005).”
An amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative learning. (2011, methodology): “The consequences for lexical processing of the entanglement of a simple word with its inflectional paradigm have been gauged in previous studies with Shannon’s entropy (Shannon, 1948), a measure that estimates the amount of information carried by an inflectional paradigm (Baayen, Feldman, & Schreude”
Suffix Ordering and Morphological Processing (2009, methodology): “…that Derived Frequency taps into procedural memory traces for complex words (i.e., past experience with parsing and producing the complex word), and that Base Frequency taps into the general availability of the base word (see Baayen 2007b, Balling & Baayen 2007, Taft 2004, Baayen et al. 2008a).”
Processing trade-offs in the reading of Dutch derived words (2010, methodology): “Similarly, Baayen et al. (2007) observed an interaction between whole word frequency and base frequency in English (prefixed and suffixed) derived and inflected words, using the visual lexical decision data.”