Nightmares, Demons, and Slaves: Exploring the Painful Metaphors of Workplace Bullying 169
By M. Hinner. 2010
139 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f13eba398ba11d0cf017f1321ba395287f20235a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Sociology and Political Science
- Pamela Lutgen-Sandvik
- Sarah J. Tracy
- Petr Kveton
- Tony Cassidy
- M. McLaughlin
- Khalid Zaman
- Muhammad Imran Qureshi
- K. Zábrodská
Citations in the corpus
- A New Trilogy to Understand the Relationship among Organizational Climate, Workplace Bullying and Employee Health (2014, background): “Since bullying is considered as a recurring ‘hammering away’ at targets (Tracy et al., 2006), various researchers openly disregard one time incidents as a bullying instances (Rayner, Hoel, & Cooper, 2002; Einarsen & Hoel, 2001; Leymann, 1990; Salin, 2001).”
- Workplace Bullying: Causes, Consequences, and Corrections (2010, unknown): “Whatever the constellations of markers, bullies act in ways identified as pathological, poweraddicted , and controlling Lutgen-Sandvik & Sypher -5 3 (Namie & Namie, 2000; Tracy et al., 2006).”
- Bullying and health at work: The mediating roles of psychological capital and social support (2014, result): “This replicates previous findings on social resources (Djurkovic et al., 2008; Leather et al., 1998; Schat & Kelloway, 2003; Soares et al., 2000; Tracy et al., 2006), and also provides some initial evidence of an important role for psychological capital in regard to bullying at work.”
- Answering Five Key Questions About Workplace Bullying (2012, background): “Communication researchers also recognize the language-related problem created for targets when scholars label workplace bullying with so many different terms (Tracy et al., 2006).”
- Prevalence and Forms of Workplace Bullying Among University Employees (2012, result): “This finding is not unexpected, as previous surveys and interviews with bullying targets showed that the perpetrator’s personality (particularly its “pathological” features) is typically experienced by targets as one of the prominent causes (see e.g., Björkqvist et al. 1994; Tracy et al. 2006; Zapf ”