Modern Regression Discontinuity Analysis
By Howard S. Bloom. 2012
118 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f0922dcbe7ce548ad78cc4b9b8c8f1e570103c4e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- John P. Robinson
- C. Weiland
- H. Yoshikawa
- Sean F. Reardon
- Pei Zhu
- Howard S. Bloom
- Robin Jacob
- Marie-Andrée Somers
In Statistics and Probability
- John P. Robinson
- C. Weiland
- H. Yoshikawa
- Sean F. Reardon
- Pei Zhu
- Howard S. Bloom
- Robin Jacob
- Marie-Andrée Somers
Citations in the corpus
- Examining Prison Effects on Recidivism: A Regression Discontinuity Approach (2017, unknown): “Modern RD analysis (see e.g. Bloom, 2012; Dunning, 2012; Murnane & Willett, 2011) conceptualizes the RD design as equating cases near the cut score.”
- The Effects of Test Translation on Young English Learners’ Mathematics Performance (2010, methodology): “Regression discontinuity is viewed as the closest approximation to an experimental design that can be obtained from nonexperimental data (Bloom, 2010; Cook, Shadish, & Wong, 2008; Lee & Lemieux, 2009; Murnane & Willett, 2010; Robinson & Reardon, 2009; Schneider, Carnoy, Kilpatrick, Schmidt, & Shavel”
- Regression Discontinuity Designs With Multiple Rating-Score Variables (2012, background): “R,X|T ); see Bloom, 2009; Schochet, 2009, for 98 S. F. Reardon and J. P. Robinson recent detailed discussions): se(δ̂RD) = √√√√ ( σ̂ 2Y |T )( 1 − R2Y.”
- A Practical Guide to Regression Discontinuity (2012, background): “Broadly speaking, there are two types of strategies for correctly specifying the functional form in a single-rating RD case (Bloom, 2012).”
- Impacts of a prekindergarten program on children's mathematics, language, literacy, executive function, and emotional skills. (2013, methodology): “A standard application of the RD methodology, provided all assumptions are met, provides an unbiased estimate of the average effect of assignment to the treatment condition (vs. control) for participants immediately on either side of the cutoff (Bloom, 2012; Murnane & Willett, 2010).”