Psychological Needs as a Predictor of Cyber Bullying: A Preliminary Report on College Students

By Bulent Dilmac. 2009

268 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eeea4fa7448cc04bb11dc2241a357e1d6699f460

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

ONLINE HARASSMENT AMONG COLLEGE STUDENTS (2012, background): “Only one study, however, was found that specifically addressed issues of online harassment among college students and it was conducted in Turkey (Dilmaç 2009).”
Why Do Adults Engage in Cyberbullying on Social Media? An Integration of Online Disinhibition and Deindividuation Effects with the Social Structure and Social Learning Model (2016, background): “…via 6 different media no children (mean 12.7) 1211 final–year pupils of primary schools and first–year pupils of all levels of secondary schools Dilmac (2009) yes(0.29 ) no self-report cyberbullying no university (mean 19.3) 693 socioeconomic status university students Doane et al.…”
Cyberbullying in context: Direct and indirect effects by low self-control across 25 European countries (2011, background): “A number of studies have documented the relationships between aggression and cyberbullying (Ang, Tan, & Mansor, 2011; Aricak, Siyahhan, Uzunhasanoglu, Saribeyoglu, Ciplak, et al., 2008; Calvete, Orue, Estévez, Villardón, & Padilla, 2010; Dilmaç, 2009) or other measures of problem behaviours, as well”
Cyberbullying among University Students: Gendered Experiences, Impacts, and Perspectives (2014, background): “On the other hand, Dilmaç [47] found that male students were more likely to report cyberbullying behaviour, whereas female students weremore likely to report victimization.”
Prevalence, Psychological Impact, and Coping of Cyberbully Victims Among College Students (2012, background): “Overall, prevalence rates of cyberbully victimization ranged from 4.8% (Sourander et al., 2010) to 55.3% (Dilmac, 2009) across all age groups.”
Cyberbullying in College (2014, background): “…which indicate cyberbullying can be a catalyst for impaired mental health, psychological distress, provokes fear, and in extreme cases increases risk factors associated with suicide among college populations (Dilmac, 2009; Hartwell-Walker, 2010; Lindsay & Krysik, 2012; Zacchilli & Valerio, 2011).”
Cybercrime detection in online communications: The experimental case of cyberbullying detection in the Twitter network (2016, result): “A few studies (Calvete, Orue, Est evez, Villard on, & Padilla, 2010; Vandebosch & Van Cleemput, 2009) show that males are more likely to engage in cyberbullying behaviors than females, but other studies show the opposite (Dilmac, 2009; Sourander et al., 2010).”
Cyberbullying in Greek Adolescents: The Role of Parents☆ (2014, background): “…extensive access to the Internet, a fact that is in accordance with the findings of previous international studies which indicated the same or even higher rates of adolescents’ internet connectivity (Dilmac, 2009; Lenhart, 2005; Subrahmanyam, Kraut, Greenfield, & Gross, 2001; Ybarra et al, 2006).”
Bullying in the digital age: a critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. (2014, background): “…individuals may engage in cyberbullying as a way of retaliating for traditional bullying victimization (Dooley et al., 2009; Hemphill et al., 2012; Raskauskas & Stoltz, 2007) or previous involvement with cyberbullying as either victim or perpetrator (Dilmac, 2009; Kowalski, Morgan, & Limber, 2012).”