Intelligence and Achievement: Just how Correlated are they?
By J. Naglieri, B. Bornstein. 2003
145 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ecb6aaa321ee7dd02d4ddd3dad6f9bcc8f5e40c9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Matthew R. Reynolds
- Scott Barry Kaufman
- A. Kaufman
- Xin Liu
- K. McGrew
- Pui‐wa Lei
- Marley W. Watkins
- Gary L. Canivez
In Statistics and Probability
- Pui‐wa Lei
- Randy J. Bachmeier
- Gretchen B. LeFever
- J. Kauffman
- Scott Barry Kaufman
- Marley W. Watkins
- Gary L. Canivez
- K. McGrew
Citations in the corpus
- Psychometric Intelligence and Achievement: A Cross-Lagged Panel Analysis. (2007, background): “Indeed, concurrent IQ–achievement correlations are substantial (Naglieri & Bornstein, 2003) and, consequently, comparisons of IQ and achievement scores constitute one of the primary methods of diagnosing learning disabilities (Yen, Konold, & McDermott, 2004).”
- Are cognitive g and academic achievement g one and the same g? An exploration on the Woodcock–Johnson and Kaufman tests (2012, background): “Research has shown that IQ and achievement test scores have yielded correlation coefficients that usually range from the mid-.60s to mid-.70s (Naglieri & Bornstein, 2003) and sometimes reach the mid-.80s (The Psychological Corporation, 2003, Table 5.15), based on a variety of…”
- Response-to-Intervention: Separating the Rhetoric of Self-Congratulation from the Reality of Specific Learning Disability Identification (2008, background): “…(D. Fuchs & Young, 2006), the value of modern tests of cognitive processing is found in their ability both to predict academic performance (Naglieri & Bornstein, 2003), and to identify processing strengths and weaknesses that have relevance for both identification and intervention (Hale &…”
- Differential Ability Scales – Second Edition (Neuro)psychological Predictors of Math Performance for Typical Children and Children with Math Disabilities (2008, unknown): “…Fleischner, 1994; Geary, Hoard, and Hamson, 1999; Isaacs, Edmonds, Lucas, & Gadian, 2001; Leonard, Lombardino, Giess, & King, 2005; Mazzocco, 2001; Naglieri & Bornstein, 2003; Nicholson & Fawcett, 2001; Njiokiktjien, de Rijke, & Jonkman, 2001; Pugh et al., 2000; Richards et al., 2006; Ruff et…”