Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance
By Peter W. Roberts, G. Dowling. 2002
2,909 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eb6b552c3e8e7d7caa90019f34a4a2b9eafc4e36
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Mike W. Peng
- Michael A. Hitt
- Nadine Gatzert
- Donald S. Siegel
- Thomas M. Zellweger
- Violina P. Rindova
- Timothy G. Pollock
- Heli Wang
In Economics and Econometrics
- Rajshree Agarwal
- Michael A. Hitt
- Geoffrey G. Jones
- Balagopal Vissa
- Aya S. Chacar
- Maurizio Zollo
- Cheng Gao
- Tiona Zuzul
In Strategy and Management
- Nadine Gatzert
- Dev R. Mishra
- Donald S. Siegel
- Lorraine Eden
- Michael A. Hitt
- Violina P. Rindova
- Mike W. Peng
- Aron O'Cass
Citations in the corpus
- Portfolio Entrepreneurship in Family Firms: A Resource-based Perspective (2011, background): “Most importantly, it is regarded as an intangible resource that leads to favorable outcomes, such as improved performance and value creation (Roberts and Dowling, 2002; Shane and Cable, 2002; Shamsie, 2003; Rindova et al., 2010).”
- Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital (2011, neutral): “reducing the firm’s costs (Roberts and Dowling, 2002).”
- Corporate social responsibility, product market perception, and firm value (2020, positive): “According to the RBV, value is derived from corporate reputation as an important strategic asset that differentiates a company from its competitors and is difficult for competing firms to replicate (Fombrun and Shanley, 1990; Roberts and Dowling, 2002).”
- Keeping up Appearances (2013, background): “Rankings also have a tendency to take on a life of their own, drawing attention to the positive aspects of highly ranked firms (e.g., Fombrun and Shanley, 1990; Roberts and Dowling, 2002) and cultivating positive expectations about the way that organizations should behave in their respective field (”
- Family Control, Socioemotional Wealth and Earnings Management in Publicly Traded Firms (2014, background): “Reputation decline has been shown to negatively impact both immediate firm performance and the sustainability of superior performance, or longer-term firm performance (Roberts and Dowling, 2002).”
- A Study of Management Perceptions of the Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Organisational Performance in Emerging Economies: The Case of Dubai (2008, background): “…(Barney, 1991; Deephouse, 2000; Fombrun and Shanley, 1990; Roberts and Dowling, 2002; Shamsie, 2003), ‘‘precisely because the development of a good reputation takes considerable time and depends on a firm making stable and consistent investments over time’’ (Roberts and Dowling, 2002, p. 1091).”
- The Effect of R&D Intensity on Corporate Social Responsibility (2010, background): “According to the RBV, firms with assets that are valuable and rare possess a competitive advantage and may expect to earn superior returns, and those firms whose assets are also difficult to replicate may record a sustained superior financial performance (Barney, 1991; Grant, 1991; Roberts and Dowli”
- Overcoming Institutional Voids: A Reputation-Based View of Long Run Survival (2017, background): “Hence, we define markets as “emerging” when institutional voids (an absence of intermediaries) leaves participants struggling to find ways to bring buyers and sellers together to engage in mutually productive exchange.”
- How Does the Market Value Corporate Sustainability Performance? (2011, positive): “Corporate reputation has been identified as one of the most important intangible resources that provide a firm sustainable competitive advantage (Roberts and Dowling 2002).”