Keeping up Appearances

By Mary-Hunter McDonnell, Brayden G. King. 2013

425 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Safety Research, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/20d4b0a50cb093f09bbc1cb39d44b013fed6ad20

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Safety Research

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Value Creation, Appropriation, and Distribution: How Firms Contribute to Societal Economic Inequality (2018, background): “Nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), nonprofits, and social movements can mobilize consumer pressure to force investment into social responsibility (Aguilera, Rupp, Williams, & Ganapathi, 2007; McDonnell & King, 2013).”
Mind the Gap: The Interplay Between External and Internal Actions in the Case of Corporate Social Responsibility (2015, background): “…and accepted organizational structures and strategies (usually already implemented by large, established firms)—and externally focused actions, such as those aimed at gaining organizational endorsement by external constituents (e.g., Sine, David, & Mitsuhashi, 2007; McDonnell & King, 2013).”
The Mirror Effect: Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Social Irresponsibility and Firm Performance in Coordinated Market Economies and Liberal Market Economies (2019, background): “For example, McDonnell and King (2013) found that firms that were subject to boycotts were more likely to counter by increasing their prosocial claims.”
Strategy and commitments to institutional logics: Organizational heterogeneity in business models and governance (2016, background): “…for-profit corporations, activists increasingly challenge firms to address alternative social and environmental concerns in their governance strategies (Campbell, 2007; De Bakker et al., 2013; Den Hond and De Bakker, 2007; McDonnell and King, 2013; Margolis and Walsh, 2003; Weber et al., 2008).”
Which of These Things Are Not Like the Others? Comparing the Rational, Emotional, and Moral Aspects of Reputation, Status, Celebrity, and Stigma (2019, methodology): “Scholars interested in high reputation only have used the ranking to create a binary measure using cutoffs, such being ranked in the top 25 (Haleblian et al., 2017; Pfarrer et al., 2010), or created multiple categories (McDonnell & King, 2013; Vasi & King, 2012).”