Personality and Work. Reconsidering the Role of Personality in Organizations

By Giles Hirst, Rolf van Dick. 2004

101 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eb6748bf6dd86ca16cc03320ee15e55130b1ef74

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Organizational citizenship behavior: A review and extension of its nomological network (2008, background): “Johnson (2003) noted, however, that this proposition has only received partial empirical support: Specifically , Schmit et al. (1996) reported that extraversion mediated the effect of contextual knowledge on contextual performance, but not for conscientiousness and agreeableness.”
Servant leaders inspire servant followers: Antecedents and outcomes for employees and the organization (2013, background): “Agreeableness reflects an empathetic concern for others (Barrick & Mount, 1991), whereas extraversion reflects a tendency to be “sociable, gregarious, assertive, talkative, and active” (p. 3).”
The five-factor model of personality traits and organizational citizenship behaviors: a meta-analysis. (2011, unknown): “As anticipated by researchers who discussed the role of Openness in the literature, " this variable will play an increasingly important role in explaining behavior in a world of work characterized by diversity and rapid change " (Hough, 2003, p. 300).”
Let's put the person back into entrepreneurship research: A meta-analysis on the relationship between business owners' personality traits, business creation, and success (2007, background): “…personality traits, business startup, and success need to be explicitly conceptualized (Low & MacMillan, 1988); true effects will be underestimated if one does not select the appropriate personality traits that are more likely to be predictive of entrepreneurship (Johnson, 2003; Tett et al., 2003).”
RECONSIDERING THE USE OF PERSONALITY TESTS IN PERSONNEL SELECTION CONTEXTS (2007, background): “As a consequence, interest in and research on personality testing in I-O psychology has dramatically increased in the past 10 years (Barrick & Ryan, 2003; Hough & Furnham, 2003; Schmitt, Cortina, Ingerick, & Wiechmann, 2003).”
RELATIONSHIP OF PERSONALITY TRAITS AND COUNTERPRODUCTIVE WORK BEHAVIORS: THE MEDIATING EFFECTS OF JOB SATISFACTION (2006, background): “Some researchers argue that the use of multiple, narrow personality trait measures offers greater fidelity , for example, more precision and better prediction, than using fewer, broader measures based on the FFM (e.g., Hough, 2003).”
An Integrative Analysis of Person-Organization Fit Theories (2004, background): “Ryan and Kristof-Brown (2003) note that ‘‘. . . personalitybased P–”
Social Entrepreneurial Intention Formation of Corporate Volunteers (2013, background): “In the context of entrepreneurship, self-efficacy is considered highly relevant; various scholars have provided empirical support for the positive relationship between self-efficacy and entrepreneurial performance (Barrick and Ryan 2003; Krueger and Brazeal 1994; Stevenson and Jarillo 1990).”
Personality Predicts Academic Performance: Exploring the moderating role of gender (2005, background): “…scoring of emotional stability) and openness to experience (intellect) has received considerable support in terms of its robustness and generalisation across theoretical frameworks, assessment methods (self versus peer rating) and cultures (see Hogan & Ones, 1997; Saucier & Goldberg, 2003).”