Psychic Distance, its Impact and Coping Modes

By J. Child, S. Rodrigues, J. Frynas. 2009

150 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ea594ad274eaa1dd45aaba53fa3bff609c8ac08e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

1. Luis Filipe Lages
2. V. Taras
3. Carlos M. P. Sousa
4. Anja Schuster
5. Peter R. Magnusson
6. Barry L. Bayus
7. Anna Shaojie Cui
8. Fang Wu

In Strategy and Management

1. Carlos M. P. Sousa
2. Luis Filipe Lages
3. Peter R. Magnusson
4. V. Taras
5. Anja Schuster
6. Jorge Lengler
7. F. Bradley
8. Matthew J. Robson

Citations in the corpus

• The Concept of Distance in International Business Research: A Review and Research Agenda (2016, unknown): “We chose 1977 as Johnson and Vahlne’s (1977) seminal article published that year essentially broke ground for distance-related IB research (Child et al. 2009).”
• The PD scale: a measure of psychic distance and its impact on international marketing strategy (2011, background): “Recent psychic distance literature (Child et al., 2009; Dow and Ferencikova, 2010) indicates that research in the field should follow a multi-dimensional perspective because there is no single item or dimension to capture the full essence of this phenomenon.”
• A Process-Based Explanation of the Psychic Distance Paradox: Evidence from Global Virtual Teams (2014, background): “…work, we expect ‘distances’ between the home and foreign country to result from the perceptions of national differences in various aspects such as business practices or the cultural, political, geographic, and/or economic environments (Child et al. 2009; Ghemawat 2001; Håkanson and Ambos 2010).”