‘Social Sharedness’ as a Unifying Theme for Information Processing in Groups

By Robin Tindale, Tatsuya Kameda. 2000

216 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Management Science and Operations Research, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ea4a20f4fcf9365869ac980e81ef3465a3e3a6ff

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

In Management Science and Operations Research

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Differential effects of problem-solving demands on individual and collaborative learning outcomes. (2011, background): “…by each group member can be consciously and actively shared (i.e., retrieving and explicating information), discussed (i.e., encoding and elaborating information), and remembered (i.e., personalising and storing information) (Hinsz et al., 1997; Tindale & Kameda, 2000; Tindale & Sheffey, 2002).”
How leader humility helps teams to be humbler, psychologically stronger, and more effective: a moderated mediation model (2017, background): “…such as ongoing interactions and coordinative dynamics, behavior modeling (Bandura, 1997), social and emotional contagion (Barsade, 2002; Dawkins et al., 2015), social sharedness (Tindale & Kameda, 2000), and mental model convergence (Mathieu, Heffner, Goodwin, Sales, & Cannon-Bowers, 2000).”
Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Group Processes (2001, background): “…& Hastie, 1993, 1996), and this body of literature helped to crystallize the idea of groups as information-processing systems (Hinsz, Tindale, & Vollrath, 1997; Larson & Christensen, 1993) with “social sharedness” as an underlying theme (Kameda, Tindale, & Davis, in press; Tindale & Kameda, 2000).”
Social Network Analysis in the Science of Groups: Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Applications for Studying Intra- and Intergroup Behavior (2015, background): “…systems that derive decisions based on the extent to which their members share cognitions or preferences (Mojzisch, Kerschreiter, Faulmüller, Vogelgesang, & Schulz-Hardt, 2014; Tindale & Kameda, 2000) implies that graph-level parameters in information networks serve as useful measures.”
Knowledge networks in new product development projects: A transactive memory perspective (2005, background): “Accordingly, the goal of our study was to investigate the factors effecting TMS and the consequences of it in an NPD project team context.”
Socially Situated Cognition: Cognition in its Social Context (2004, unknown): “…to be social, distributed, and shared (Caporael, 1997; Levine, Resnick, & Higgins, 1993; Resnick, Levine, & Teasley, 1991; Schwartz, 1996) and what group cognition may entail (Kerr et al., 2000; Ruscher & Duval, 1998; Tindale & Kameda, 2000; see for a general review: Thompson & Fine, 1999).”
Task complexity as a driver for collaborative learning efficiency: The collective working-memory effect (2011, background): “…held by each group member is consciously and actively shared (i.e., retrieving and explicating information), discussed (i.e., encoding and elaborating information) and remembered (i.e., personalizing and storing information) (Hinsz et al., 1997; Tindale & Kameda, 2000; Tindale & Sheffy, 2002).”
Motivated Information Processing in Group Judgment and Decision Making (2008, background): “…of the influential view of groups as information processors (Hinsz et al., 1997; Levine & Moreland, 1998; McGrath, 1997; Nijstad & Paulus, 2003; Tindale & Kameda, 2000; D. van Knippenberg & Schippers, 2007) and argue that this view can be extended by inclusion of motivational influences on…”
Shared Information, Cognitive Load, and Group Memory (2002, background): “Shared Information,”
An Evolutionary Upgrade of Cognitive Load Theory: Using the Human Motor System and Collaboration to Support the Learning of Complex Cognitive Tasks (2012, background): “This architecture consists of an effectively unlimited long-term memory intended to govern activity in the same way as a genome governs biological activity.”
Group performance and decision making. (2004, background): “As argued by Kameda et al. (2002; see also Tindale & Kameda 2000), like majority models, they show the influence of “social sharedness” at the preference level.”