Motivated Information Processing in Group Judgment and Decision Making

By C. D. De Dreu, B. Nijstad, D. van Knippenberg. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2008

741 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/aad50d9def69bb56944d8004f904acbf5f3cf0b3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Organizational Decision-Making Structures in the Age of Artificial Intelligence (2019, background): “28 For example, psychology research has shown that decision fatigue may lead to deteriorating quality of decisions as an individual’s mental energy is gradually depleted, 29 and research in cognitive science and neuroscience has shown that emotions constitute powerful and sometimes unpredictable…”
Cognitive diversity and team creativity: Effects of team intrinsic motivation and transformational leadership (2016, background): “When team members are exposed to the different preferences and opinions held by others, they must engage in systematic information processing, characterized by deeper and elaborate dissemination as well as integration of knowledge and information among team members (De Dreu et al., 2008).”
Team Reflexivity and Innovation (2015, background): “…on their work context and by discussing how their working methods can be improved to ensure an effective response to that context, teams will develop a deeper understanding of the problem at hand and will be better able to fashion effective ways of dealing with demands (cf. De Dreu et al., 2008).”
Beyond productivity loss in brainstorming groups: The evolution of a question (2010, methodology): “192 Wolfgang Stroebe et al. De Dreu et al. (2008a) applied these ideas to a topic within the social cognition literature: the effects of mood states on creative performance.”
Managing Joint Production Motivation: The Role of Goal Framing and Governance Mechanisms (2011, background): “It is also associated with prosocial behaviors (Grant, 2008a), such as spontaneous sharing of knowledge (De Dreu et al., 2008; Gagnè, 2009), which, in turn, may positively impact work productivity and innovation performance (Tsai, 2001).”
Status Conflict in Groups (2012, background): “Furthermore, sharing information is needed to achieve optimal joint outcomes (De Dreu and Carnevale 2003, De Dreu et al. 2008).”