What's in a frame anyway?: A meta-cognitive analysis of the impact of one versus two sided message framing on attitude certainty

By Derek D. Rucker, Richard E. Petty, P. Briñol. 2008

167 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c1b482b7e3a6144046b47cbc5e998f5ebc238bdc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Consumer conviction and commitment: An appraisal-based framework for attitude certainty (2014, background): “As one example, Rucker et al. (2008) presented participants with a persuasive message promoting a mountain bike.”
When Blemishing Leads to Blossoming: The Positive Effect of Negative Information (2012, background): “For example, we found that the blemishing effect requires low processing effort, whereas past research on two-sided messages suggests that they should be most persuasive under high-processing conditions (e.g., Hastak and Park 1990; Petty and Wegener 1998; Rucker et al. 2008).”
Exploring the Valence‐Framing Effect: Negative Framing Enhances Attitude Strength (2011, background): “Rucker et al. (2008) hypothesized that when a message is framed as though both sides were presented (i.e., the two-sided message frame condition), participants will feel an enhanced perception of knowledge (i.e., being better informed about the product) relative to when a message is not framed in…”
The Elaboration Likelihood Model of persuasion: Developing health promotions for sustained behavioral change. (2009, background): “In one study, for instance (Rucker, Petty, and Briñol, 2008), students were presented with one of two messages.”
PERSUASION: INSIGHTS FROM THE SELF VALIDATION HYPOTHESIS (2009, background): “In a test of the idea that emotion-relevant cognitions can be validated, Rucker et al. (2008a) used an ease of retrieval manipulation to induce a sense of confidence or doubt in one’s thoughts.”