The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity.

By R. Friedman, Jens Förster. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2001

1,123 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e68d56619b0ec4ecf57993c7f3d59993925df0e8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Bringing ethics into focus: How regulatory focus and risk preferences influence (Un)ethical behavior (2011, methodology): “Following Friedman and Foster (2001), in both conditions we”
A Dynamic Definition of Creativity (2019, background): “The attentional scopes facilitate access to remotely associated content in memory (Förster & Dannenberg, 2010), which may be useful for problem restructuring, creative insight (Schooler & Melcher, 1995), and divergent thinking (Friedman & Förster, 2001).”
Group-based self-regulation: The effects of regulatory focus (2008, methodology): “Regulatory focus was either assessed using the regulatory focus questionnaire (Higgins et al., 2001) or manipulated based on promotion and prevention cues (Friedman & Förster, 2001).”
Context matters: combined influence of participation and intellectual stimulation on the promotion-focus/employee creativity relationship (2012, background): “Thus, it is not surprising that an individual’s regulatory focus has been shown to predict creativity in experimental settings (Friedman & Förster, 2000, 2001) as well as in self-ratings of creativity (Neubert et al., 2008).”
Regulatory Fit and Persuasion: Basic Principles and Remaining Questions (2008, neutral): “While prior work (Crowe & Higgins, 1997; Friedman & Förster, 2001) has shown that prevention-focused individuals exhibit a conservative bias toward neutral stimuli in a signal detection paradigm, Scholer et al. (forthcoming) found that when the stimuli are negative, this tactical preference shifts.”
Transformational Leadership and Employee Creativity: The Mediating Role of Promotion Focus and Creative Process Engagement (2014, background): “Promotion focus has been shown to be beneficial for creative behavior (Friedman and Förster 2001).”
A Review of Multilevel Regulatory Focus in Organizations (2015, background): “As innovation is a key characteristic of entrepreneurship, evidence supports the importance of a promotion focus in the creative process (e.g., Friedman & Förster, 2001).”
An Assessment of Chronic Regulatory Focus Measures (2010, neutral): “In a final session, we (1) evaluated participants’ creativity by having them generate creative and unusual uses for a brick (Friedman and Förster 2001) and (2) obtained the size of their consideration set (i.e., the options they seriously considered) by soliciting the number of movies they…”
How extending your middle finger affects your perception of others: Learned movements influence concept accessibility (2009, positive): “…spatial representation (e.g., Tucker & Ellis, 1998), problem solving (Broaders, Cook, Mitchell, & Goldin-Meadow, 2007), cognitive style (e.g., Friedman & Förster, 2001) and person perception (Mussweiler, 2006), among others (for reviews see Barsalou, 2008; Niedenthal, Barsalou, Winkielman,…”
Developmental changes in personal goal orientation from young to late adulthood: from striving for gains to maintenance and prevention of losses. (2006, background): “Moreover, in young adulthood, approach motivation is associated with persistence in goal pursuit, task performance, and subjective well-being (Coats, Janoff-Bulman, & Alpert, 1996; Freund, 2006; Friedman & Förster, 2001; Roney, Higgins, & Shah, 1995).”
Enactment of approach and avoidance behavior influences the scope of perceptual and conceptual attention (2006, background): “" As described earlier, in this task, participants had to complete a maze in which they were to help a cartoon mouse Wnd the exit (Friedman & Förster, 2001).”