The duality of mind: an historical perspective

By Keith Frankish, Jonathan Evans. 2009

208 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/253a48c4e2bba77896fc2c574c8a57f1657d216a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Psychology

1. Neil D. Lawrence
2. A. Samson
3. Benjamin G. Voyer
4. Jonathan Evans

In History and Philosophy of Science

1. Neil D. Lawrence
2. A. Samson
3. Benjamin G. Voyer
4. Jonathan Evans

In Social Psychology

1. Neil D. Lawrence
2. A. Samson
3. Benjamin G. Voyer
4. Andrew Vincent
5. Jonathan Evans
6. B. Brewer
7. J. V. Van Raalte

Citations in the corpus

• Living Together: Mind and Machine Intelligence (2017, methodology): “In particular we will make use of dual process theories [7].”
• Self-talk: Review and sport-specific model (2016, background): “Dual-process theories have been long been considered as explanations for human behavior, having been espoused by Plato, Descartes, James, Freud, and other notables (Frankish & Evans, 2009).”
• Two minds, three ways: dual system and dual process models in consumer psychology (2012, methodology): “We then introduce Kahneman and Frederick’s (2002) Intuitive vs.”
• Reflections on reflection: the nature and function of type 2 processes in dual-process theories of reasoning (2019, background): “This distinction has been around for centuries in philosophical writing, and dual-process theories abound in modern psychology, often developed independently (Frankish & Evans, 2009).”