On the distinction between rationality and intelligence: Implications for understanding individual differences in reasoning.

140 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Nature and Development of Critical-Analytic Thinking (2014, background): “conclusions, those individuals, if fair-minded, would worry about their own biases getting in the way of evidence interpretation and valid inference making (Stanovich 2012).”
Performance on the Cognitive Reflection Test is stable across time (2018, background): “Over the past several years a substantial body of evidence has indicated that people vary in the extent to which they utilize Type 2 processing in decision making (Stanovich & West, 2000; Stanovich, 2012), and this proclivity has been attributed to differences in “analytic cognitive style” (ACS) (Pe”
Predicting biases in very highly educated samples: Numeracy and metacognition (2014, background): “…and decision making because they assess (i) heuristic-based deliberation and metacognition (Cokely & Kelley, 2009; Cokely et al., 2012; see also Stanovich, 2012; reflectiveness, Baron, 1985), (ii) affective numerical intuition (Peters, 2012; Peters et al., 2006; Slovic, Finucane, Peters,…”