JOB ENGAGEMENT: ANTECEDENTS AND EFFECTS ON JOB PERFORMANCE

By B. Rich, Jeffrey LePine, Eean R. Crawford. 2010

3,891 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e4ee8a1f0c598e33bea0ad7334df74fd57c896e9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

1. Arnold B. Bakker
2. Wilmar B. Schaufeli
3. Evangelia Demerouti
4. Osman M. Karatepe
5. B. Shuck
6. A. Saks
7. M. Tims
8. Daantje Derks

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Arnold B. Bakker
2. Wilmar B. Schaufeli
3. Evangelia Demerouti
4. B. Shuck
5. Osman M. Karatepe
6. Sharon K. Parker
7. A. Saks
8. Simon Albrecht

In Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

1. Adam M. Grant
2. Arnold B. Bakker
3. Wilmar B. Schaufeli
4. Christian Vandenberghe
5. M. Tims
6. Daantje Derks
7. J. Nahrgang
8. Simon Albrecht

Citations in the corpus

• Integrative Literature Review: Four Emerging Perspectives of Employee Engagement: An Integrative Literature Review (2011, positive): “The academic approach is a recent, emerging phenomenon (Rich et al., 2010; Saks, 2006; Wefald & Downey, 2009) and thus scholarly research is in the early stages of development, not yet organized into collections of theoretical or conceptual frameworks.”
• Workplace spirituality and employee engagement (2011, background): “For example, according to Rich et al. (2010), engagement differs from job involvement, job satisfaction, and instrinsic motivation because it involves a “more holistic investment of the self into one’s role” while these other constructs “emphasize narrower aspects of the employee’s self” (p. 617).”
• Highly engaged but burned out: intra-individual profiles in the US workforce (2018, methodology): “Engagement was assessed with items developed by Rich et al. (2010).”
• Examining the impact of abusive supervision on employees’ psychological wellbeing and turnover intention: The mediating role of intrinsic motivation (2020, background): “Employees are ready to do well because they are self-motivated at work (Menges et al., 2017) (Rich et al., 2010).”
• The Energizing Nature of Work Engagement: Toward a New Need-Based Theory of Work Motivation (2017, background): “…suggests that work engagement contributes to various positive organizational outcomes, including productivity (Masson, Royal, Agnew, & Fine, 2008; Rich et al., 2010), task and overall performance (Bakker & Demerouti, 2008; Rich et al., 2010; Schaufeli & Salanova, 2007), organizational…”