Cyberbullying: the nature and extent of a new kind of bullying, in and out of school

By Peter K. Smith, Robert Slonje. 2010

134 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e4de606d0ccbc9c3b08d12bf9f9b7b2474ce78af

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

The Influence of Moral Disengagement, Morally Based Self-Esteem, Age, and Gender on Traditional Bullying and Cyberbullying (2013, background): “Cyberbullying also lacks physical or social cues (Smith & Slonje, 2010).”
School Bullying and Cyberbullying Among Boys and Girls: Roles and Overlap (2017, background): “Smith and Slonje (2010) and Menesini and Nocentini (2009), on the other hand, argued that the repetition criteria does not apply for cyberbullying.”
Cyberbullying and traditional bullying in adolescence: Differential roles of moral disengagement, moral emotions, and moral values (2012, background): “Traditional bullying decreases during adolescence, whereas cyberbullying increases over the years of secondary school (Smith & Slonje, 2010).”
The nature of cyberbullying, and strategies for prevention (2013, background): “Some reviews of cyberbullying already exist (e.g., Mora-Merchán & Jäger, 2010; Smith, 2012; Smith & Slonje, 2010; Tokunaga, 2010), but the area is developing very rapidly, in part as new technologies develop and new fashions (such as particular social network sites) appear.”
Cyberbullying among youth: A comprehensive review of current international research and its implications and application to policy and practice (2013, background): “Estimates vary as to which proportion of cybervictims know the person who is bullying, ranging from anywhere between 43% and 80% (Cassidy et al., 2011; Kowalski et al., 2012b; Patchin & Hinduja, 2012a; Smith et al., 2008; Smith & Slonje, 2010; Vandebosch & Van Cleemput, 2009; Yilmaz, 2011).”
Different forms of bullying and victimization: Bully-victims versus bullies and victims (2013, background): “Although it has been suggested (e.g., Smith & Slonje, 2010, p. 258) that bully-victims are especially likely to engage in cyberbullying, our findings indicated that bully-victims outweighed bullies most clearly in physical and verbal bullying.”
Longitudinal Risk Factors for Cyberbullying in Adolescence (2013, background): “Many cyberbullies are also traditional bullies (Smith, 2011 b; Smith & Slonje, 2010).”
Peer victimisation and depressive symptoms: can specific coping strategies buffer the negative impact of cybervictimisation? (2012, background): “Although cyberbullying also happens outside the school context, victims often know their perpetrators from school (Smith and Slonje 2010), and teachers and the school, as a functional system, should not overlook or belittle cybervictimisation.”
Processes of cyberbullying, and feelings of remorse by bullies: A pilot study (2012, background): “However, differences exist between the two types as well (see Smith & Slonje, 2010), such as the 24/7 (that someone can be bullied at any and every time and/or place) aspect in cyberbullying, or the larger breadth of audience.”