How Do We Justify Knowledge Produced Within Interpretive Approaches?

602 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Engineering Competence? An Interpretive Investigation of Engineering Students' Professional Formation (2011, background): “At the same time, the reflexive log trail served as a repository for reflections on the process of analysis and the influence of values and preconceptions resulting in a potential bias when interpreting the data (Sandberg, 2005; Sochacka, Walther, Kavanagh, & Jolly, 2009).”
Unveiling Professional Development: A Critical Review of Stage Models (2006, methodology): “We have proposed an alternative model of professional skill development, although we acknowledge a need for further empirical research about the pragmatic validity (Kvale, 1989; see also Dall’Alba, 2004; Sandberg, 2005) of this model.”
‘It’s good to be angry’: Enacting anger in construction project management to achieve perceived leader effectiveness (2011, background): “In so doing, we take a distinctive position akin to those writers who are interested in phenomenology as a way of eliciting perceived experiences of individuals under investigation (e.g. Dasborough et al., 2003; Fineman, 2004; Sandberg, 2005).”