Methodological Alignment in Design-Based Research

By Christopher Plekss Hoadley. 2004

366 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Information Systems and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e32a726885bde8d691f9523c434c080c901b0e55

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Sanna Järvelä
2. Frank Fischer
3. Pierre Dillenbourg
4. Lisa C. Yamagata-Lynch
5. Ernesto Panadero
6. Raija Hämäläinen
7. Katja Vähäsantanen
8. Hanna Järvenoja

In Information Systems and Management

1. Lisa C. Yamagata-Lynch

Citations in the corpus

• Confronting Analytical Dilemmas for Understanding Complex Human Interactions in Design-Based Research From a Cultural—Historical Activity Theory (CHAT) Framework (2007, background): “Unfortunately, design-based research often becomes problematic because data collection, analysis, and presentation methods inevitably involve complicated procedures (Collins, Joseph, & Bielaczyc, 2004; Hoadley, 2004).”
• The Evolution of Research on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (2009, background): “Hoadley, 2004 ). In contrast, other researchers hold that there are possibilities of disentangling a small number of key variables on different planes (individual, group, class) that might be varied or controlled in multilevel experimental designs (Fischer, Wecker, Schrader, Gerjets, & Hesse, 2005; ”