Innovations in governance

By M. Moore, J. Hartley. 2008

403 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Public Administration, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e281ba3b53986c104bd3a798b58b7a80a53a9674

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Public Administration

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Firm Growth and Corruption: Empirical Evidence from Vietnam (2017, background): “While many papers starting with Mauro (1995) argue that corruption impedes growth, there is much less work on the reverse direction, namely the idea that corruption may subside as countries grow (notable exceptions include Treisman (2000) and Gundlach and Paldam (2009)).”
Comparing Public and Private Sector Employees’ Innovative Behaviour: Understanding the role of job and organizational characteristics, job types, and subsectors (2015, background): “Innovation in public organizations is a rising issue because of the challenges public organizations face (Moore and Hartley 2008; Sørensen and Torfing 2011), where innovation has been argued to help deal with economic and social challenges (Osborne and Brown 2011).”
Team innovation through collaboration: how visionary leadership spurs innovation via team cohesion (2020, background): “…teams – are increasingly utilized to generate public value in a context of wicked societal problems, thinly stretched resources and limited capacities of individual public organizations (Bryson, Crosby, and Bloomberg 2014; Bryson, Crosby, and Stone 2015; Moore and Hartley 2008).”
How European public sector agencies innovate: The use of bottom-up, policy-dependent and knowledge-scanning innovation methods (2015, background): “Bottomup agencies have several of the characteristics of ‘organizational entrepreneurship’ described by Moore and Hartley (2008), where managers have the discretionary ability to invest in strategies to support the development of ideas proposed by staff and middle management.”
Does Economic Growth Reduce Corruption? Theory and Evidence from Vietnam (2013, positive): “One option involves focused improvements in governance in one region, as suggested by Wei (1999b) and Fisman and Werker (2010), with the idea being that competitive pressure of the type discussed here would lead these improvements to spill over to other regions.”