A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships.

By S. Gully, Kara A. Incalcaterra, Aparna Joshi, J. M. Beauien. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2002

1,115 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dffff685f845cf2bf56271cc2fb1ae83ec2aa3cf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

EFFICACY DISPERSION IN TEAMS: MOVING BEYOND AGREEMENT AND AGGREGATION (2010, background): “Existing research shows that team efficacy as a shared construct positively impacts performance (Gully et al., 2002), but this research focuses exclusively on the performance phase of a task.”
Ethical Leadership and Employee Moral Voice: The Mediating Role of Moral Efficacy and the Moderating Role of Leader–Follower Value Congruence (2015, background): “There exists ample empirical evidence supporting the role of efficacy beliefs across levels of analysis (Gully et al. 2002; Stajkovic et al. 2009; Stajkovic and Luthans 1998).”
Transformational Leadership and Work-Related Attitudes: The Moderating Effects of Collective and Self-Efficacy Across Cultures (2005, background): “Like self-efficacy, evidence from past research suggests that collective efficacy is positively related to performance, problem solving, and work-related attitudes (Gully et al., 2002).”
Psychological Capital: An Evidence-Based Positive Approach (2017, background): “Two meta-analyses support a relationship between collective efficacy and performance at the group level, especially among teams with higher task interdependence (Gully et al. 2002, Stajkovic et al. 2009).”
Group Potency and Collective Efficacy (2003, background): “Among others, leadership in groups may be one of the most important of the variables that need to be examined in future research (Gibson et al., 2000; Gully et al., 2002).”
Conceptual Framework and Statistical Procedures for Delineating and Testing Multilevel Theories of Homology (2005, methodology): “38; Stajkovic & Luthans, 1998) is highly similar to the “true” collective efficacy—group performance correlation (ρ = .39; Gully et al., 2002).”
Team Effectiveness 1997-2007: A Review of Recent Advancements and a Glimpse Into the Future (2008, background): “Given the amount of research pertaining to team cohesion, there are several meta-analytic reviews (e.g., Gully et al., 2002; Webber & Donahue, 2001).”