Morphological Awareness: A Key to Understanding Poor Reading Comprehension in English.
By X. Tong, S. H. Deacon, John R. Kirby, K. Cain, Rauno Parrila. 2011
250 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/de7b5e6a398ff5b28c0d42fd66ee0d373b1dd55a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
In Education
In Statistics and Probability
Citations in the corpus
- The incremental variance of morphological knowledge to reading comprehension in grades 3-10 beyond prior reading comprehension, spelling, and text reading efficiency☆ (2012, result): “The strong correlations of morphological knowledge with winter and spring FAIR reading comprehension in all grades except 10 were affirmations of previous research demonstrating strong associations between morphological awareness and reading comprehension (Carlisle, 2000; Deacon & Kirby, 2004; Kieff”
- A Comprehensive Definition of Morphological Awareness: Implications for Assessment (2014, background): “Even when some researchers have used multiple measures, albeit an incomplete set of tasks, to represent morphological awareness, they then combined responses from those tasks into one composite measure (e.g., Clin, Wade-Woolley, & Heggie, 2009; Tong et al., 2011).”
- The Science of Reading Progresses: Communicating Advances Beyond the Simple View of Reading (2021, background): “…on reading ability (e.g., Gottardo, Mirza, Koh, Ferreira, & Javier, 2018; Kirby et al., 2012; Zhang & Ke, 2020), is implicated in reading difficulties (e.g., Tong, Deacon, Kirby, Cain, & Parrila, 2011), and is widely understood to be related to both word recognition and language comprehension.”