The Employee Engagement Scale: Initial Evidence for Construct Validity and Implications for Theory and Practice

By B. Shuck, J. Adelson, Thomas G. Reio Jr.. 2017

270 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/de5bd3df2ca32813d7d62a34be5bb34484a1a504

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

1. B. Shuck
2. Karl Hofmeyr
3. M. Weideman
4. Kim F. Nimon
5. Kobena Osam
6. Drea Zigarmi

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. B. Shuck
2. Kim F. Nimon
3. Drea Zigarmi
4. Kobena Osam
5. Karl Hofmeyr
6. M. Weideman
7. Taesung Brian Kim
8. Thomas G. Reio Jr.

In Social Psychology

1. B. Shuck
2. Karl Hofmeyr
3. M. Weideman
4. Kim F. Nimon
5. Kobena Osam
6. Drea Zigarmi

Citations in the corpus

• The influence of flexible work arrangements on employee engagement: An exploratory study (2020, background): “The positive effects of engaged employees are well researched and recognised in the literature and businesses (Shuck et al., 2017).”
• Definitional and Conceptual Muddling: Identifying the Positionality of Employee Engagement and Defining the Construct (2017, background): “When it 268 Human Resource Development Review 16(3) comes to employee engagement, we aligned with Shuck, Adelson, and Reio (2016) and Shuck and Wollard (2010), who proposed that experiences of cognition and emotion were important expressions of the experience and highlighted a certain set of…”