Governance, organizational capabilities, and restructuring in transition economies

By Igor Filatotchev, Mike Wright, Klaus Uhlenbruck, Laszlo Tihanyi, R. Hoskisson. 2003

211 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/de5569054b1811d3945b9aa558fd2c21afb549fe

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Guest Editors' Introduction Strategy Research in Emerging Economies: Challenging the Conventional Wisdom* (2005, unknown): “These factors include the development of market institutions, (high) levels of government involvement, industry structures, ownership patterns, and enforcement of business laws (Filatotchev et al., 2003; Khanna and Palepu, 1997, 2000; La Porta et al., 1998; Peng, 2000, 2003).”
Business groups' outward FDI: A managerial resources perspective (2010, background): “Hence, we analyze, what determines the international scope of business groups? We combine the institutional perspective with a resource-based perspective following a recent trend in emerging economy research (Filatotchev et al., 2003; Meyer et al., 2009a; Malik and Kotabe, 2009).”
Corporate Governance in Emerging Economies: A Review of the Principal-Principal Perspective (2008, background): “…lower levels of dividends payout (La Porta et al., 2000), less information contained in stock prices (Morck et al., 2000), inefficient strategy (Filatotchev et al., 2003; Wurgler, 2000), less investment in innovation (Morck et al., 2005), and, in many cases, expropriation of minority…”
Diversified Business Groups and Corporate Refocusing in Emerging Economies (2005, background): “In this regard, as noted earlier, privatization through voucher or “giveaway” schemes is highly unlikely to influence strong changes if the leadership in the organization follows the mentality from the previous central planning regime ( Filatotchev, Wright, Uhlenbruck, Tihanyi, & Hoskisson, 2003 ).”
Probing theoretically into Central and Eastern Europe: transactions, resources, and institutions (2005, background): “as organizational learning theories (Fiol and Lyles, 1985), evolutionary theories (Kogut and Zander, 1993), and dynamic capabilities views (Teece et al.”
The Roles and Performance of State Firms and Non-State Firms in China’s Economic Transition (2008, unknown): “They have widely applied the resource-based view (RBV) (Barney, 1991; Wernerfelt, 1984) and the resource dependence approach (Pfeffer & Salancik, 1978) to examine firm strategy and performance in transition economies (e.g., Davies & Walters, 2004; Flilatotchev, Wright, Uhlenbruck, Tihanyi, & Hoskis”
Stages of Organizational Transformation in Transition Economies: A Dynamic Capabilities Approach (2010, unknown): “…heritage, and absorptive capacity Transition economies Empirical Dixon et al. (2007) Organizational learning Transition economies Empirical Filatotchev et al. (2003) Corporate governance and learning capacity Transition economies Empirical Newman (2000) Effect of institutional upheaval on…”