Written Corrective Feedback in Second Language Acquisition and Writing

By V. Busse. 2013

338 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ddb8e0ac59e337810de84a3bf0f4334f07958787

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Shulin Yu
2. Icy Lee
3. Natsuko Shintani
4. Judit Kormos
5. L. Waller
6. Mostafa Papi
7. R. Ellis
8. Wataru Suzuki

In Education

1. Icy Lee
2. Shulin Yu
3. R. Ellis
4. Mostafa Papi
5. Wataru Suzuki
6. Judit Kormos
7. L. Waller
8. Natsuko Shintani

In Language and Linguistics

1. Shulin Yu
2. Icy Lee
3. Mostafa Papi
4. Natsuko Shintani
5. L. Waller
6. R. Ellis
7. Judit Kormos
8. Wataru Suzuki

Citations in the corpus

• Peer feedback in second language writing (2005–2014) (2016, background): “Recent years have seen a surge of interest in feedback in writing in general and written corrective feedback in particular, and as a result a number of significant reviews have been published (Ferris 2003, 2010, 2012; Hyland & Hyland 2006; Bitchener & Ferris 2012).”
• Motivation and feedback: How implicit theories of intelligence predict L2 writers’ motivation and feedback orientation (2017, background): “Thirty years of research on written corrective feedback (WCF) in the fi eld of Second Language Writing have shaped our current understanding of how WCF works (for reviews see Bitchener, 2008; Bitchener & Ferris, 2012).”
• SYSTEMIC FUNCTIONAL LINGUISTIC GENRE PEDAGOGY (SFL GP) IN A TERTIARY EFL WRITING CONTEXT IN INDONESIA (2015, background): “Each draft was given feedback “to help students build awareness, knowledge and strategic competence to develop skills to better monitor their own writing in the future” (Bitchener & Ferris, 2012, p. 140).”
• Effects of Written Feedback and Revision on Learners’ Accuracy in Using Two English Grammatical Structures (2014, methodology): “In this case, no specific corrections are made; the ME is provided in the form of post-writing instruction, for example, as in the handout given to the students in the current study.2 WCF comes in a variety of forms (Bitchener & Ferris, 2012).”
• Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing studies (2012, background): “These include Ferris (2003, 2004), Hyland & Hyland (2006), Guénette (2007), and Bitchener & Ferris (2012).”
• The role of individual differences in L2 writing (2012, background): “On the other hand, as Bitchener and Ferris (2012) also suggest both experimental and exploratory research would be useful to gain a better understanding of how learners with different cognitive and motivational profiles benefit from various types of feedback.”
• Research into practice: Written corrective feedback (2012, positive): “More recently, Bitchener & Ferris (2012) have added that comprehensive and unfocused WCF may be useful to advanced learners with a high level of accuracy.”