Effects of Written Feedback and Revision on Learners’ Accuracy in Using Two English Grammatical Structures

260 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Effects of written corrective feedback and language aptitude on verb tense accuracy (2019, background): “…direct error correction that included metalinguistic-information; Shintani and Ellis (2013) found an advantage for metalinguistic explanation; and Shintani et al. (2014) showed an advantage for direct error correction; other studies, however, such as Bitchener (2008), Bitchener and Knoch (2008;…”
The revision and transfer effects of direct and indirect comprehensive corrective feedback on ESL students’ writing (2018, methodology): “The effectiveness of focused WCF has already been established in the previous research (e.g., Bitchener, 2008; Bitchener & Knoch, 2008, 2009a, 2009b, 2010; Ellis et al., 2008; Sheen, 2007; Sheen, 2010b; Shintani & Ellis, 2013; Shintani et al., 2014).”
The Nature of Feedback: How Peer Feedback Features Affect Students' Implementation Rate and Quality of Revisions. (2016, unknown): “…receiving solutions helped these learners improve their writing performance (AbuSeileek & Abualsha'r, 2014; Bitchener, 2012; Bitchener , Young, & Cameron, 2005; Nelson & Schunn, 2009; Shintani, Ellis, & Suzuki, 2014; Sugita, 2006; Tseng & Tsai, 2007; Van Beuningen, De Jong, & Kuiken, 2012).”