An empirical examination of transaction- and firm-level influences on the vertical boundaries of the firm

By Michael J. Leiblein, Douglas J. Miller. 2003

669 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Finance, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dcb97265ed70d48cbed56f09e352d77a9079c96c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Finance

In Management Science and Operations Research

Citations in the corpus

Real options theory in strategic management (2017, background): “Literature examining the firm value and performance implications of real options has extended our knowledge in assessing market valuation (e.g., Kester, 1984; Oriani, 2007; Oriani and Sobrero, 2008; Trigeorgis and Ioulianou, 2013) and firm performance beyond standard measures such as Tobin’s q and a”
Losing Sight of the Forest for the Trees? Productive Capabilities and Gains From Trade as Drivers of Vertical Scope (2005, positive): “This might not be particularly relevant in a mature industry like mortgage banking, yet it would be a significant omission in a more dynamic setting (White, 2000; Afuah, 2001; Schilling and Steensma, 2002; Leiblein and Miller, 2003).”
A Review of Outsourcing from the Resource-Based View of the Firm (2006, positive): “The crossorganizational boundary capabilities are developed on the basis of incremental learning, the specific resources in the relationship, knowledge, complementary resources and capabilities, efficient governance of the relationship and the sourcing experience (Dyer and Singh 1998; Kale et al. 20”
Does being R&D intensive still discourage outsourcing?: Evidence from Dutch manufacturing (2005, neutral): “For if R&D intensity and outsourcing are as incompatible as suggested above, how can we explain the rises in outsourcing in R&D intensive environments that have been reported (Leiblein and Miller, 2003; Quinn, 2000)?”
Capabilities, Transaction Costs, and Firm Boundaries (2011, neutral): “3 One paper that recognized this issue is Leiblein and Miller (2003). While they concluded that: “The main findings indicate that firm-level capabilities and strategies independently and significantly affect firms’ vertical boundary choices,” (p.”
Antecedents and performance consequences of international outsourcing (2005, background): “While there is a wide and growing range of studies looking at the performance consequences of the outsourcing or make-or-buy decision in general (Leiblein and Miller, 2003), the impact of the location dimension of outsourcing on performance is seldom addressed.”
Economic Foundations of Strategy (2004, background): “…1991; and Walker and Weber, 1984, 1987]; • Statistical Models Using Secondary Data: [E.g. Balakrishnan and Wernerfelt, 1986; Caves and Bradburd, 1988; Leiblein and Miller, 2003; Leiblein, Reuer and Dalsace, 2002; and Levy, 1985]; 5 For mathematical models of vertical integration see Balakrishnan…”
Using Transaction Cost Economics to explain outsourcing of accounting (2010, background): “Moreover, the number of employees is not a good proxy when studying outsourcing, since the number of employees is directly dependent upon the outcome of the outsourcing decision (Leiblein and Miller 2003).”
The Choice of Organizational Governance Form and Performance: Predictions from Transaction Cost, Resource-based, and Real Options Theories (2003, background): “Empirical research has provided findings consistent with this interactive effect (Coles & Hesterly, 1998; Leiblein & Miller, 2003; Walker & Weber, 1987).”