Evaluation of Response to Intervention Practices for Elementary School Reading. NCEE 2016-4000.
By R. Balu, Pei Zhu, F. Doolittle, Ellen P. Schiller, J. Jenkins, R. Gersten. 2015
136 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dbd810c4584c3742cff5cf81f27511af809b1ca3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- R. Slavin
- Joseph A. Dimino
- R. Gersten
- Kelly S. Haymond
- Rebecca Newman-Gonchar
- Madhavi Jayanthi
- Bryan G. Cook
- Alan C. K. Cheung
Citations in the corpus
- Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Reading Interventions for Students in the Primary Grades (2020, methodology): “…conclude that the research base underlying reading interventions is sound and not the primary reason for the lack of impacts in the national RtI evaluation (Balu et al., 2015), which found null, or in one case negative, impacts on reading outcomes for students at or near the cut point on screening.”
- How evidence-based reform will transform research and practice in education (2020, background): “However, studies of RTI do not find it to be effective (Balu et al., 2015), because RTI principles are rarely fully implemented (Fuchs & Fuchs, 2017; Ruffini, Miskell, Lindsay, McInerney, & Waite, 2016).”