Aggression and Bullying
By Elis Hennessey, S. Guerin. 2002
170 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/001f0a5ed5f21bb95d73f328aad16b7d5e3b2c12
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Herbert W. Marsh
- Alexandre J. S. Morin
- Dorothy Espelage
- Benjamin Nagengast
- Anthony A. Volk
- D. Cornell
- Jun Sung Hong
- R. Craven
Citations in the corpus
- The roles of orbital frontal cortex in the modulation of antisocial behavior. (2004, background): “Bullying is an example of instrumental aggression and, unsurprisingly, individuals who engage in bullying behaviors, frequently engage in other forms of instrumental antisocial behavior in other contexts (Roland & Idsoe, 2001).”
- The Culture of Bullying in Middle School (2003, background): “Additionally, bullying appears to be related to both reactive and proactive aggression, although the role of proactive aggression may increase with age (Roland & Idsoe, 2001; Salmivalli & Nieminen, 2002).”
- Identifying Potential Mediators and Moderators of the Association Between Child Maltreatment and Bullying Perpetration and Victimization in School (2011, background): “, a defensive response to abuse, which involves both bullies and victims) than proactive aggression (i.e., goal-directed and deliberate action in order to achieve one’s goals and involves bullies only; Roland and Idsoe 2001).”
- Bullying roles in changing contexts: The stability of victim and bully roles from primary to secondary school (2005, background): “However, it remains a topic of special interest to focus on the bullying construct with both peer and self-assessment (e.g., by the participant role approach; Salmivalli et al., 1996), and to explain overlapping and nonoverlapping properties when assessed longitudinally (Salmivalli, 2001).”
- Bullying and Victimization Among Native and Immigrant Adolescents in Norway (2009, methodology): “Structural equation models confirmed our hypotheses on the whole sample level and are in line with previous research (e.g., Roland and Idsøe, 2001), but not when we split boys and girls into two groups according their immigration status.”
- What is bullying? A theoretical redefinition. (2014, background): “…consistently associated with proactive aggression (Camodeca & Goossens, 2005; Fandrem, Strohmeier, & Roland, 2009; Fossati et al., 2009; Roland & Idsoe, 2001; Salmivalli & Nieminen, 2002; Sijtsema, Veenstra, Lindenberg, & Salmivalli, 2009), though in some studies it has been linked to both…”
- Classroom influences on bullying (2002, background): “The empirical evidence for this conclusion is substantial (Olweus, 1980, 1999; Roland and Idsøe, 2001).”
- Construct Validity of the Multidimensional Structure of Bullying and Victimization: An Application of Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling. (2011, background): “A growing body of research from around the world (Harachi, Catalano, & Hawkins, 1999; Roland & Idsøe, 2001; Smith et al., 1999; Sullivan, 2000) shows that bullying and victimization tend to be positively correlated.”
- Bullying among students and its consequences on health (2006, background): “Bullying can be defined as all forms of repeated physical or mental violence performed by an individual on another person who is not capable of defending him/herself (Roland & Idsoe, 2001).”
- Bullying, depressive symptoms and suicidal thoughts (2002, background): “Empirical evidence for this theory is that bullies are high on proactive aggressiveness (Roland and Idsoe, 2001),which is a stable tendency to conduct unprovoked negative behaviour to achieve some reward, such as social rewards of the kind mentioned above (Berkowitz, 1993; Dodge, 1991; Dodge and…”
- Proactive and reactive aggression in childhood and adolescence: A meta-analysis of differential relations with psychosocial adjustment (2006, unknown): “…Camodeca et al. (2002) 242 8.8 teacher –.17** –.79*** .25*** .81*** –2.96*** Lento (2001) 127 6.5 observations –.11 –.31*** .17 .33*** –.75*** Little et al. (2003) 1723 13.7 self –.06* –.07** –.05* –.06* –.01 Roland & Idsøe (2001) 3884 11.5 self .10*** –.04* .20*** .18*** –.24***…”