Adjusting researchers' approach to adjustment: On the use of covariates when testing interactions

By V. Yzerbyt, Dominique Muller, C. Judd. 2004

331 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d5cbec33ac6ee92a12488bbe9d35308731718b2a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Mastery and performance goals predict epistemic and relational conflict regulation (2006, methodology): “Complete analyses of covariance (Yzerbyt et al., 2004) were conducted with gender and age.”
A particular resiliency to threatening environments (2006, methodology): “SAT was used as a covariate in the analysis, not as a way of adjusting for pre-existing diVerences in SAT, but as a way to increase power (see Yzerbyt, Muller, & Judd, 2004 ).”
Mediation analysis allowing for exposure-mediator interactions and causal interpretation: theoretical assumptions and implementation with SAS and SPSS macros (2013, neutral): “Such moderated mediation by a covariate was also analyzed by Yzerbyt, Muller, and Judd (2004) and Muller, Yzerbyt , and Judd (2008).”
Stereotype threat among schoolgirls in quasi-ordinary classroom circumstances (2007, methodology): “The Student Gender Task 5 Following Yzerbyt, Muller, and Judd (2004), each interaction term between the covariate (students’ math grades) and the two manipulated variables (task characterization and gender composition) were entered into the ANCOVA.”
Stereotype internalization and women’s math performance: The role of interference in working memory ☆ (2007, methodology): “statistic performance (time 1) and its interactions with other factors (see Yzerbyt et al. (2004)).”
The interplay of mastery and performance goals in social comparison: A multiple-goal perspective. (2010, background): “Because the covariate did not correlate with any of the independent variables, the interactions between the covariate and the independent variables were not included in the model (Muller, Yzerbyt, & Judd, 2008; Yzerbyt et al., 2004).”
Social Class is Dead. Long Live Social Class! Stereotype Threat among Low Socioeconomic Status Individuals (2007, result): “As in previous studies (e.g., Gonzales, Blanton, & Williams, 2002; Steele & Aronson, 1995), and following recent discussions on covariance models ( Yzerbyt, Muller, & Judd, 2004 ), we entered as a covariate the SAT score as well as its product with Diagnosticity and Income.4”
The joy of pain and the pain of joy: In-group identification predicts schadenfreude and gluckschmerz following rival groups’ fortunes (2015, methodology): “Additionally, the condition by fandom interaction was included in the model, per Yzerbyt et al.’s (2004) guidelines on interaction tests with covariates.”