Perceptions of and reactions to leader toxicity: Do leader-follower relationships and identification with victim matter?☆

93 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Understanding the Disparate Behavioral Consequences of LMX Differentiation: The Role of Social Comparison Emotions (2018, background): “Erdogan and Bauer’s (2015: 419) recent LMX review noted that researchers need to adopt a more “balanced approach” and should explicitly consider “potential downsides to having a highquality exchange” (for rare exceptions, see Ballinger et al., 2010; Pelletier, 2012; Shapiro, Boss, Salas, Tangirala, ”
Defeating the Toxic Boss: The Nature of Toxic Leadership and the Role of Followers (2020, background): “Furthermore, previous research has suggested that environments with high levels of instability and change, as well as lack of checks and balances, may create contexts for emergence of toxic leadership (Pelletier 2012; Thoroughgood et al., 2012).”
Best Practice Recommendations for Designing and Implementing Experimental Vignette Methodology Studies (2014, background): “Examples of such studies include Aguinis and Adams (1998), Newcombe and Ashkanasy (2002), and Pelletier (2012).”
Destructive Leadership: A Critique of Leader-Centric Perspectives and Toward a More Holistic Definition (2016, background): “, less likely to demoralize, upset, or leave an enduring effect on them) (Pelletier 2012).”