Does Choice Mean Freedom and Well‐Being?
By H. Markus, Barry Schwartz. 2010
292 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Marketing, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d506d08382b345e36cd8c6e8bb2d5b2453b07d6a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Marketing
- Maarten Vansteenkiste
- Bart Soenens
- Renaud Lunardo
- Valerie A. Lykes
- Jill G. Griffin
- Francesca Gino
- A. Keinan
- Markus Kemmelmeier
In Social Psychology
- Maarten Vansteenkiste
- Bart Soenens
- Richard M. Ryan
- Edward L. Deci
- W. Lens
- J. Reeve
- Kennon M. Sheldon
- Athanasios Mouratidis
Citations in the corpus
- Psychological Ownership Motivation and Use of Social Media (2015, unknown): “For example, an item used by Markus and Schwartz (2010) for “efficacy and effectance need satisfaction” is “I felt very capable in what I did.””
- What Predicts Loneliness? Cultural Difference Between Individualistic and Collectivistic Societies in Europe (2014, background): “In more individualistic countries, receiving assistance was associated with higher levels of loneliness, likely because individuals were unable to meet the culturally championed goal of independence and self-determination (cf. Markus & Schwartz, 2010; Oishi, Diener, Lucas, & Suh, 1999).”
- Achieving Immersion in the Tourism Experience: The Role of Autonomy, Temporal Dissociation, and Reactance (2020, background): “Such freedom is consensually labeled as autonomy (e.g., Levav and Zhu 2009; Markus and Schwartz 2010).”
- Basic psychological need satisfaction, need frustration, and need strength across four cultures (2015, background): “Several crosscultural psychologists have defined autonomy as independence or individualism, which gets contrasted with dependence and collectivism (e.g., Markus and Schwartz 2010).”
- Does Psychological Need Satisfaction Matter When Environmental or Financial Safety are at Risk? (2015, background): “This differentiation is critical because some cross-cultural researchers understood SDT’s notion of autonomy as independence and, on these grounds, argued that BPNT’s universality claim should be refuted (e.g., Iyengar & Lepper, 1999; Markus & Schwartz, 2010).”
- Consumers and Artificial Intelligence: An Experiential Perspective (2020, unknown): “People from poorer childhood backgrounds have a lower sense of control than those from wealthier ones (Mittal and Griskevicius 2014), and collective self-construal is associated with a lower desire for choice freedom and control (Bernthal, Crockett, and Rose 2005; Markus and Schwartz 2010).”
- When Choice Does Not Equal Freedom (2011, background): “While the relationship between ‘‘freedom’’ and choice is cast as universal, we suggest that the choice literature represents a largely middle-class perspective (Heine & Norenzayan, 2006; Markus & Schwartz, 2010).”
- Decision Difficulty in the Age of Consumer Empowerment (2014, background): “The large assortments available today offer freedom of choice (Botti & Iyengar, 2004; Markus & Schwartz, 2010; Reibstein, Youngblood, & Fromkin, 1975) and opportunities to learn about product categories.”
- Basic psychological need theory: Advancements, critical themes, and future directions (2020, unknown): “Although the concept of autonomy had received attention from scholars in the fields of cross-cultural psychology (Markus and Schwartz 2010), adolescent development (Steinberg and Silverberg 1986), and organizational psychology (Warr 1994), their view on autonomy was in many cases more restrictive (r”
- Let Us Not Throw Out the Baby With the Bathwater: Applying the Principle of Universalism Without Uniformity to Autonomy-Supportive and Controlling Parenting (2015, background): “autonomy support (and providing choice, in particular) have recently been called into question (11).”
- The red sneakers effect: Inferring status and competence from signals of nonconformity. (2014, background): “The significance of freedom and autonomy is built into the founding documents of the United States, and the idea that individuals are independent and autonomous is pervasive and generally greatly admired (Dworkin 1988; Markus and Schwartz 2010).”