Processing a second language: Late learners''comprehension mechanisms as revealed by event-related b

By Anja Hahne, Angela D. Friederici. 2001

390 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d365ec91db829f9e4506544562b9b37c59f99913

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Language and Linguistics

Citations in the corpus

Age and Second Language Acquisition and Processing: A Selective Overview (2006, background): “…that is, the timing components of high-proficient L2 use are by and large similar to those of L1 use, even when acquisition of L2 was begun at age 12 or later (e.g., Hahne, 2001; Hahne & Friederici, 2001; Ojima, Nakata, & Kakigi, 2005; Proverbio , Cok, & Zani, 2002; Stowe & Sabourin, 2005).”
Juggling Two Languages in One Mind (2008, background): “…The evidence that has been taken to suggest that there are constraints on late L2 acquisition comes largely from investigations of sensitivity of late acquirers to aspects of the L2 syntax (e.g., Clahsen & Felser, 2006; Hahne & Friederici, 2001; Johnston & Newport, 1989; Weber-Fox & Neville, 1996).”
Plausibility and recovery from garden paths in second language sentence processing (2011, neutral): “…studies showing that learners’ syntactic processing abilities may be reduced or less automatized compared to native speakers’ (Felser & Roberts, 2007; Felser, Roberts, Gross, & Marinis, 2003; Hahne & Friederici, 2001; Marinis, Roberts, Felser, & Clahsen, 2005; Papadopoulou & Clahsen, 2003).”
Neurolinguistic aspects of attrition (2004, background): “…have been shown to exhibit differences in brain activation patterns in studies based on tasks involving grammatical processing (e.g., with ERP: Hahne & Friederici, 2001; Weber-Fox & Neville, 1996; and fMRI: Kim, Relkin, Lee & Hirsch, 1997; Perani, Dehaene, Grassi, Cohen, Cappa, Dupoux, Fazio…”
The interplay of individual differences and context of learning in behavioral and neurocognitive second language development (2018, background): “At higher levels of proficiency and exposure, L2 learners often show P600s for syntactic violations (e.g. Bowden et al., 2013; Hahne and Friederici, 2001; Rossi et al., 2006).”
Electrophysiological correlates of second language processing (2005, neutral): “Hahne and Friederici (2001) reported that native Japanese late L2 learners of German showed neither of the two ERP effects in response to word category violations, but instead showed a greater P600 for the correct sentences as compared to native speakers.”
Selective optionality in language development (2005, background): “…regarded as complementary to behavioural evidence resulting from linguistic and psycholinguistic research.15 Summarizing a complex picture (see Hahne and Friederici 2001 for an overview), ERP studies point to: (a) A reduced automaticity of the phrase structure component: this is signaled by…”
Morphosyntactic processing in advanced second language (L2) learners: An event-related potential investigation of the effects of L1–L2 similarity and structural distance (2014, background): “…processing, the absence of the LAN for morphosyntactic violations in L2 processing has traditionally been interpreted as evidence that L2 learners do not process morphosyntactic dependencies in a native-like manner (Clahsen and Felser, 2006; Hahne and Friederici, 2001; Weber-Fox and Neville, 1996).”
The Impact of Proficiency on Syntactic Second-language Processing of German and Italian: Evidence from Event-related Potentials (2006, result): “Recent ERP studies suggest that proficiency has to be considered as a factor influencing the L2 ERP pattern in semantics (Elston-Gu ¨ttler, Paulmann, & Kotz, 2005; Kotz & Elston-Gu ¨ttler, 2004) but particularly in syntax (Hahne, 2001; Hahne & Friederici, 2001 )., Hahne and Friederici (2001) inves”
The processing of ambiguous sentences by first and second language learners of English (2003, background): “…use of phrase structure information during L2 processing might be reduced relative to that of native speakers is also supported by the results from recent event-related potentials (ERPs) studies carried out by Hahne (2001) and Hahne and Friederici (2001) on Russian and Japanese learners of German.”
Syntactic features and reanalysis in near-native processing (2006, methodology): “…non-native processing have been reported in an eye-tracking study by Frenck-Mestre (2002) and in event-related potential (ERP) studies (Hahne, 2001; Hahne and Friederici, 2001; Sabourin, 2003), in which more advanced learners demonstrate evidence of automatic neurophysiological responses to…”
Incremental interpretation in second language sentence processing (2006, background): “…and behavioural studies that suggests that native and non-native sentence processing is similar along the semantic dimension, but dissimilar along the syntactic dimension (Hahne and Friederici, 2001; Felser, Roberts, Gross and Marinis, 2003; Sanders and Neville, 2003; Clahsen and Felser, in press).”
Bilinguals reading in their second language do not predict upcoming words as native readers do (2013, neutral): “1 (Elston-Güttler & Friederici, 2007; Hahne, 2001; Moreno & Kutas, 2005; Weber-Fox et al., 2003), suggesting that semantic processing is slower for reading in L2 than in L1 (for reviews , see Hernandez & Li, 2007; Kotz, 2009; Kotz & Elston-Guettler, 2007; Kutas, Moreno, & Wicha, 2009).”
Grammatical processing in language learners (2006, background): “…(Ardal, Donald, Meuter, Muldrew, & Luce, 1990; Hahne, 2001; Hahne & Friederici, 2001; Weber-Fox & Neville, 1996) and pronounceable nonwords (McLaughlin, 1999) that had a delayed peak latency compared to native speakers (see Hahne, 2001; Hahne & Friederici, 2001; Weber-Fox & Neville, 1996).”
Parsing a first language like a second: The erosion of L1 parsing strategies in Spanish-English Bilinguals (2004, result): “…2002, for similar results with German and Greek learners of English; for additional literature on differences between L1 and L2 syntactic processing, see Hanhe 2001; Hahne & Friederici, 2001; Hernández, Bates, & Avila, 1994; Weber-Fox & Neville, 1996; Wulfeck, Juárez, Bates, & Kilborn, 1986).”