Formulaic Sequences: Acquisition, Processing and Use

By N. Schmitt. 2004

329 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computational Theory and Mathematics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d35627bebd897a08aab97d633efe3fc7c4aad5b7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computational Theory and Mathematics

1. F. Boers
2. Polly Tse
3. M. Garnier
4. Ken Hyland
5. Nick C. Ellis
6. Paul Rayson
7. B. Fernández
8. Philip Durrant

Citations in the corpus

• Gauging the effects of exercises on verb–noun collocations (2014, background): “…language (Wray, 2002), which has gained considerable popularity as a subject of investigation in research on second language acquisition (SLA) (e.g. Schmitt, 2004; Meunier & Granger, 2008; Wood, 2010) and second language (L2) pedagogy (e.g. Lewis, 1993; Lindstromberg & Boers, 2008; Nattinger &…”
• The PHaVE List: A pedagogical list of phrasal verbs and their most frequent meaning senses (2015, methodology): “The PHRASE List Users’ Guide by Martinez and Schmitt (2012) was used as a model for this purpose.”
• How much collocation knowledge do L2 learners have?: the effects of frequency and amount of exposure (2015, background): “It is now well established that formulaic language provides processing advantages and is essential for using language fluently and idiomatically, both for native and nonnative speakers (for overviews, see Schmitt, 2004; Wray, 2002, 2008, and Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 32, 2012).”
• Lexical bundles in L1 and L2 academic writing (2010, unknown): “" Phraseology " (Granger & Meunier, 2008; Meunier & Granger, 2007) and " formulaic sequences/language " (Schmitt, 2004; Wray, 2002, 2008) are two umbrella terms often used to refer to various types of multi-word units.”
• Pointing Out Frequent Phrasal Verbs: A Corpus‐Based Analysis (2007, background): “Many English language teachers have noted the importance of mul-tiword knowledge in developing their learners’ nativelike fluency (Moon, 1997; Schmitt, 2004; Wray, 2000, 2002).”
• From key words to key semantic domains (2008, background): “2004), fixed expressions and idioms (Moon 1998) and formulaic sequences (Schmitt 2004; Wray 2002).”
• Adult learners’ retention of collocations from exposure (2010, background): “idiomatic language use (Lewis, 2000; Nattinger and DeCarrico, 1992; Wray, 2002; Biber et al., 2004; Schmitt, 2004; Hoey, 2005).”
• Cognitive Linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary: Assessment and integration (2011, background): “They contribute to fluent language use and their (appropriate) use is a distinguishing feature of native speaker discourse (see Schmitt 2004, Meunier & Granger 2008, Barfield & Gyllstad 2009 and Wood 2010, for collective volumes on formulaic sequences in L2 learning).”
• Words as Tools: Learning Academic Vocabulary as Language Acquisition (2012, background): “003 Schmitt, N. (Ed.). (2004). Formulaic sequences: Acquisition, process-”
• Formulaic sequences and perceived oral proficiency: putting a Lexical Approach to the test (2006, background): “Schmitt and his colleagues (Schmitt, 2004) adopt ‘formulaic sequences’ as the overarching term for standardized phraseology.”
• Is There an "Academic Vocabulary"? (2007, methodology): “The instrument was based on a language analysis test developed by Ottó and used previously by Schmitt, Dörnyei, Adolphs, and Durow (2003). The test consisted of 14 multiple choice items.”