Investing with Prejudice: The Relationship between Women's Presence on Company Boards and Objective and Subjective Measures of Company Performance

By S. A. Haslam, Michelle K. Ryan, C. Kulich, Grzegorz, Trojanowski, C. Atkins. 2009

314 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Gender Studies, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d2c69c2c9c85fdd538bf4a5b1c0feaad72108b2f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Gender Studies

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Citations in the corpus

Corporate social responsibility, board of directors, and firm performance: an analysis of their relationships (2014, result): “Specifically, some studies show a positive link between gender diversity on boards of directors and firm value whereas other studies point to a negative relation (Adams and Ferreira 2009; Campbell and Mı́nguez-Vera 2010; Haslam et al. 2010).”
Board Age and Gender Diversity: A Test of Competing Linear and Curvilinear Predictions (2014, background): “Another body of research found a negative linear relationship between board gender diversity and performance (e.g., Adams and Ferreira, 2009; Bøhren and Strøm, 2010; Dobbin and Jung, 2011; Haslam et al., 2010).”
Beyond the Glass Ceiling: The Glass Cliff and Its Lessons for Organizational Policy (2014, background): “Experimental evidence comes from various samples of participants in the United Kingdom (e.g., Ashby et al., 2007; Haslam & Ryan, 2008), the United States (Brown et al., 2011; Bruckmüller & Branscombe, 2010), the Netherlands (Rink et al., 2012; 2013), Australia (Ryan et al., 2011), and Spain (Gartzi”
Gender Diversity in the Boardroom and Firm Performance: What Exactly Constitutes a “Critical Mass?” (2012, unknown): “Variables and Data Sources Concerning the dependent variable, similar to other studies that analyze the relation between women on boards and firm performance (e.g., Lindstaedt et al. 2011; Haslam et al. 2010; Shrader et al. 1997), we measure firm performance in terms of return on equity (ROE).”
A maze of metaphors around glass ceilings (2012, background): “Women who are regarded as token leaders may be subject to increased scrutiny and scepticism similar to the reactions given to an outsider (Haslam et al., 2010).”