The utility of a multifoci approach to the study of organizational justice: A meta-analytic investigation into the consideration of normative rules, moral accountability, bandwidth-fidelity, and…

220 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Illuminating the ‘Face’ of Justice: A Meta‐Analytic Examination of Leadership and Organizational Justice (2018, methodology): “This research has found that justice perceptions of the leader (i.e., supervisor- or leader-focused justice), rather than perceptions of other organizational entities (e.g., the organization itself), are most strongly related to employee outcomes (Colquitt et al., 2013; Rupp et al., 2014).”
Corporate social responsibility and employee engagement: The moderating role of CSR‐specific relative autonomy and individualism (2018, background): “…reference a source (and that justice dimensions be aggregated by source; Lavelle, Rupp, & Brockner, 2007; Lavelle, Rupp, Manegold, & Thornton, 2015; Rupp et al., 2014), 10 items pertaining to distributive and procedural justice referenced the organization (e.g., “The rewards I receive from my…”
Abusive Supervision and Employee Deviance: A Multifoci Justice Perspective (2017, unknown): “Returning to the multifoci approach to justice, individuals perceive justice by assessing who is accountable for the situation and then exhibit a reciprocal attitudinal and/or behavioral response toward the responsible party (Liao and Rupp 2005; Rupp and Cropanzano 2002; Rupp et al. 2014).”