The Antecedents and Consequences of Top Management Fraud

By Shaker A. Zahra, Richard L. Priem, Abdul Rasheed. 2005

518 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Information Systems and Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d29fee65b6a1f7d09a1b0a28450c9ee02e9b5213

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Information Systems and Management

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Psychological Pathways to Fraud: Understanding and Preventing Fraud in Organizations (2011, background): “In recent years, increasing attention is being devoted to examining fraud in organizational settings (Ashforth and Anand, 2003; Collins et al., 2009; Palmer, 2008; Zahra et al., 2005).”
Why Firms Engage in Corruption: A Top Management Perspective (2009, background): “We therefore follow other scholars that emphasize the importance of studying top executives as a means of predicting how the characteristics of individuals shape the actions taken by firms (Child, 1972; Elsbach and Sutton, 1992; Finkelstein and Hambrick, 1996; Kostova and Roth, 2002; Scott, 1995; We”
Executive Compensation and Corporate Fraud in China (2014, unknown): “The extant literature has extensively investigated antecedents and consequences of financial fraud in U.S. (see reviews by Cohen et al. 2004; Zahra et al. 2005).”
Destructive Leadership (2013, methodology): “…theory (Carver & Scheier, 1982; Giglioni & Bedeian, 1974), one could argue that the harm engendered by DL represents a deviation from the organization’s desired state of being that the organization would like to identify and correct (Kayes et al., 2007; Lipman-Blumen, 2005a; Zahra et al., 2005).”
Corruption in Asia: Pervasiveness and arbitrariness (2007, background): “However, there have been only a few attempts to examine corruption from a management perspective (Ashforth & Anand, 2003; Gordon & Miyaki, 2001; Luo, 2002; Zahra, Priem, & Rasheed, 2005).”
Corporate Social Responsibility as a Strategic Shield Against Costs of Earnings Management Practices (2014, background): “According to Zahra et al. (2005), the consequences of these discretionary practices affect investors, employees, customers and the local communities, which is eventually reflected in corporate reputation and, hence, the market value.”
Does the External Monitoring Effect of Financial Analysts Deter Corporate Fraud in China? (2014, background): “Corporate fraud is a core research topic in the business ethics literature since such misconduct can generate serious negative consequences for stakeholders (Davidson and Worrell 1988), employees (Zahra et al. 2005), and the wider society (Szwajkowski 1985).”