Risk as feelings.

By George Loewenstein, Elke U. Weber, Christopher K. Hsee, Ned Welch. Psychological bulletin, 2001

1,804 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, General Decision Sciences, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d182dfa4c731362d9e2742e0da631e01d3e60427

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Antoine Bechara
2. Paul Slovic
3. Yaacov Trope
4. Antonio R. Damasio
5. Ty W. Boyer
6. Elke U. Weber
7. Tim Dalgleish
8. B. Dunn

In General Decision Sciences

1. S. van der Linden
2. Paul Slovic
3. Elke U. Weber
4. George Loewenstein
5. Colin F. Camerer
6. Armin Falk
7. Ellen Peters
8. Melissa L. Finucane

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Paul Slovic
2. William Ocasio
3. Daniel A. Levinthal
4. Giovanni Gavetti
5. Armin Falk
6. Ty W. Boyer
7. Camelia M. Kuhnen
8. S. Sarasvathy

Citations in the corpus

• Self‐Regulation in Health Behavior: Concepts, Theories, and Central Issues (2008, background): “As we are not prepared by evolution to recognize the dangers of hamburgers, cigarettes or unsafe sex but still experience their rewarding value, inhibiting these impulses may be a difficult task (Loewenstein et al., 2001).”
• A Conditional Reasoning Measure for Aggression (2005, background): “…operational both when an aggressive person is building an ostensibly rational case to aggress (with the proviso that some acts of aggression are spontaneous) as well as after aggressive behavior has been enacted (see Loewenstein et al., 2001; Winter, John, Stewart, Klohnen, & Duncan, 1998).”
• When good decisions have bad outcomes: The impact of affect on switching behavior (2005, background): “…to a drug or object of romantic interest can lead people to approach stimuli that they should avoid, and strong fear reactions to objectively unthreatening stimuli can lead people to avoid objects to such a degree that they experience immobilizing phobic reactions (Loewenstein et al., 2001).”
• The Influence of Affect on Attitude (2005, background): “For example, Loewenstein et al. (2001) consider the case of deciding whether or not to get insurance against floods or earthquakes.”
• Beyond hubris: How highly confident entrepreneurs rebound to venture again☆ (2010, background): “That is, they perform more exploratory and creative work because they underestimate the nature, costs and likelihood of the risk that inheres in the outcomes of that work (Gervais and Odean, 2001; Loewenstein et al., 2001; March and Shapira, 1987; Simon and Houghton, 2003).”
• Reference Report: An overview of behaviour change models and their uses (2008, background): “Being the earliest model of human behaviour, Expected Utility Theory has long served as the benchmark for models of cognitive decision making; other models are understood as deviations from that standard (Loewenstein et al 2001).”
• Divergence between individual perceptions and objective indicators of tail risks: Evidence from floodplain residents in New York City (2015, background): “There is empirical evidence that individuals may ignore risks whose subjective odds are perceived to be below their threshold level of concern (Slovic et al. 1977, 1982; McClelland, Schulze, and Coursey 1993).”
• Fear, anger, and risk. (2001, background): “Adding empirical content to recent theoretical speculation (see Levin, 1999; Loewenstein & Lerner, in press; Loewenstein et al., 2001), the present studies document that a small number of trait emotion measures (fear and anger) can predict judgment and choice behavior across a range of judgment task”
• Affordable loss: behavioral economic aspects of the plunge decision (2009, background): “Moreover, recent empirical evidence suggests that emotional responses to risk are better predictors of behavior than cognitive assessments (Loewenstein et al., 2001).”
• The mere urgency effect. (2018, neutral): “…Loewenstein, & O'Donoghue 2002; McClure et al.2004）． ➢ 重要なタスクは目標達成まで遠く、確実性が低く、モチベーションが低下する（Hull 1932; Kivetz, Urminsky & Zheng 2006） ➢ 緊急のタスクを先に終わらせ、重要なタスクは後で取り組むことで、実行できるタスクの選択肢 を最大にしようとする（Shin & Ariely2004）。 THE MERE URGENCY EFFECT ➢…”
• Perspective - Neo-Carnegie: The Carnegie School's Past, Present, and Reconstructing for the Future (2007, background): “For example, Loewenstein et al. (2001) explain a wide range of phenomena that have resisted interpretation in Downloaded from informs.org by [129.170.194.156] on 26 May 2015, at 07:56 .”