But what does it mean? The use of effect sizes in educational research
By K. Elliot. 2004
140 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d16da81f08ee2077b10721687665c0e0b85d3841
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Jennifer Dewitt
- L. Archer
- Jonathan Osborne
- Katherine L. McNeill
- L. Perera
- A. Baram‐Tsabari
- V. Dawson
- Christine Chin
Citations in the corpus
- Exploring social patterns of participation in university-entrance level mathematics in England (2009, unknown): “…compared to 0.7 for Indian girls) are striking but the proportions of some of these ethnic groups out of the whole population is relatively small, so the overall effect size (Schagen and Elliot 2004) across this cohort and the whole population is relatively much smaller than the gender effect.”
- Science-related Aspirations Across the Primary–Secondary Divide: Evidence from two surveys in England (2014, background): “In educational research effect sizes above 0.5 are typically considered large, between 0.3 and 0.5, medium and 0.1 to 0.2, small (Schagen & Elliot, 2004).”