Exploring social patterns of participation in university-entrance level mathematics in England
By Andrew Noyes. 2009
51 citations recorded by the source corpus.
In recent years in England, considerable attention has been given to a range of apparent crises in mathematics education, one of which has been the long term decline of participation in university-entrance level (Advanced or A level) mathematics. Given the negative impact upon mathematics participation of a national reform of Advanced level qualifications, commonly known as Curriculum 2000, together with the government's emphasis on science, technology engineering and mathematics (STEM), the political intent to increase participation in Advanced level mathematics is clear. This paper uses the National Pupil Database (NPD) to develop a descriptive statistical account of how completion of Advanced level mathematics varies along the social axes of socioeconomic status, ethnicity and gender. The process of working with the NPD is discussed in some depth in order to clarify the processes involved in this type of quantitative analysis and then to illustrate how such analyses can be used to raise questions about who is studying mathematics in the post-16 age-range.
Subfields: Education, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Modeling and Simulation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b7abf9d135ac259765bf0fd7f068be4eb771d234
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- Geoffrey Kent
- Lori Altendorff
- Jo Boaler
- Luis A. Leyva
- Melissa S. Gresalfi
- Catherine Attard
- Alan H. Schoenfeld
- David Stinson
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
In Modeling and Simulation
Citations in the corpus
- Mathematics and science inequalities in the United Kingdom: when elitism, sexism and culture collide (2011, background): “…priority, given the large achievement differences that persist for students of different ethnicities and social classes (Archer & Francis, 2007), Noyes (2009) has demonstrated that, beyond prior attainment at GCSE, being female has a greater effect on the likelihood of a student participating…”