Experimental Evaluations of Elementary Science Programs: A Best-Evidence Synthesis

By R. Slavin, Cynthia Lake, Pam Hanley, Allen Thurston. 2014

114 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d0d60c1ed9b24de711adc30254008c5ac515e616

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Michael J. Kieffer
2. Corey O'Connor
3. Christopher D. Van Booven
4. Feng Jiang
5. Alison Haas
6. Lorena Llosa
7. Okhee Lee
8. N. Schmitt

In Education

1. Michael J. Kieffer
2. Alison Haas
3. Lorena Llosa
4. Corey O'Connor
5. Christopher D. Van Booven
6. Feng Jiang
7. Okhee Lee
8. A. Tam

In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

1. Okhee Lee

Citations in the corpus

• Impact of a Large-Scale Science Intervention Focused on English Language Learners (2016, background): “In a review of impact studies of elementary science programs, Slavin et al. (2014) found that studies of inquiryoriented programs that provided science kits did not result in positive achievement impacts and that the weighted overall mean effect size across the six studies of science kit programs…”
• Effects of innovative science and mathematics teaching on student attitudes and achievement: A meta-analytic study (2016, unknown): “With respect to the intervention, we expect that more extensive interventions, and better prepared teachers (Slavin, Lake, Hanley, & Thurston, 2014) will have stronger effects.”