Sex differences in latent cognitive abilities ages 6 to 59: Evidence from the Woodcock–Johnson III tests of cognitive abilities

By T. Keith, Matthew R. Reynolds, Puja G. Patel, Kristen P. Ridley. 2008

158 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d0c6ca0651be4ddf4dd7229801bca914957d946f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Sarah Logan
2. R. Johnston
3. Ian J. Deary
4. Sarah P. McGeown

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. C. Fernandes
2. R. Johnston
3. Ian J. Deary
4. Sarah Logan
5. Pauline Smith
6. G. Der
7. D. Liewald
8. Jack Nissan

In Statistics and Probability

1. R. Johnston
2. Ian J. Deary
3. Sarah Logan

Citations in the corpus

• Sex, intelligence and educational achievement in a national cohort of over 175,000 11-year-old schoolchildren in England. (2010, background): “Unlike evidence from a few studies that have reported on sex differences in a latent visual–spatial factor (Keith et al., 2008; Reynolds et al., 2008), we did not observe a male advantage on the nonverbal residual factor.”
• Investigating gender differences in reading (2010, methodology): “Keith et al. (2008) used the Woodcock–Johnson III test of cognitive abilities to examine gender differences: those results up to age 15 will be focused on as these are the most relevant.”