Why recommend a brand face-to-face but not on Facebook? How word-of-mouth on online social sites differs from traditional word-of-mouth

By Andreas B. Eisingerich, H. Chun, Yeyi Liu, Heqi Jia, Simon Bell. 2015

307 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We examine the conceptual difference between consumer electronic word-of-mouth on online social sites (sWOM) such as Facebook and traditional face-to-face word-of-mouth (WOM). We find that consumers are less willing to engage in sWOM than WOM. Such a difference in willingness to offer word-of-mouth can be explained by social risk associated with different communication modes. We show that the difference between people's desire to engage in sWOM and WOM is mediated by perceived social risk and amplified when social risk is made salient. Furthermore, we show that consumers' need to self-enhance mitigates the difference in willingness to offer sWOM versus WOM.

Subfields: Marketing, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d052aa39d2078f714ec3bf035e264810d7c7d6c3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Marketing

  1. Andrew T. Stephen
  2. Peeter W. J. Verlegh
  3. Mirella Kleijnen
  4. Adamantios Diamantopoulos
  5. Piyush Sharma
  6. P. K. Kannan
  7. Eva M . Oberecker
  8. Hongshuang Li

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

  1. Andrew T. Stephen
  2. Peeter W. J. Verlegh
  3. Mirella Kleijnen

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. Andrew T. Stephen
  2. Peeter W. J. Verlegh
  3. Mirella Kleijnen
  4. Adamantios Diamantopoulos
  5. Piyush Sharma
  6. P. K. Kannan
  7. Lauren Grewal
  8. Hongshuang Li

Citations in the corpus