Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind Intercultural Cooperation and Its Importance for Survival

By C. Mora. 2013

2,032 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d0244520d159b6b9f3a12b4d08bc5675f19613b2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Teacher–student interpersonal relationships in Indonesia: profiles and importance to student motivation (2011, background): “Indonesian society is characterized by a very high power distance index, indicating a high level of inequality of power and wealth within the society as well as high uncertainty avoidance index, illustrating a low level of tolerance for uncertainty and ambiguity (Hofstede, 1991).”
Drivers of local food consumption: A comparative study (2015, background): “These countries were chosen because they are both important food producers in their regions, but culturally different (Hofstede et al., 2010).”
Motivational mechanisms of employee creativity: A meta-analytic examination and theoretical extension of the creativity literature (2016, background): “…that prosocial motivation may be more functional and influential in cultures lower on individualism, which supports the notion that individuals in these cultures subordinate their personal interests and enjoyment for the pursuit of others’ welfare (Hofstede, 1991; Hofstede & Hofstede, 2005).”
Understanding Cultural Persistence and Change (2017, background): “As we show in Supplementary Appendix Tables A9 and A10, ancestral climatic instability does not have explanatory power for other standard cultural and psychological traits such as those measured by Schwartz (2010) or Hofstede et al. (2010).”
The Influence of Board Composition on Sustainable Development Disclosure (2017, background): “Previous research suggests that women care more about social and environmental issues, which makes them more encouraged than men in managing environmental risks and less likely to compromise quality of life for material success (Fukukawa et al., 2007; Hofstede et al., 2010; Liao et al., 2015).”
Intellectual capital, organisational climate, innovation culture, and SME performance (2018, background): “As it refers to deeper and more enduring values and norms (Hofstede and Hofstede, 2005), it is not easily observable within organisations (Ahmed, 1998).”
Workers' perception of workplace bullying: A cross-cultural study (2011, background): “In relation to cultural issues, Hofstede ( 1980 , 1994 ) ranked national cultures according to four cultural dimensions: power distance, individualism, uncertainty avoidance, and masculinity.”
FARMERS’ COOPERATIVES IN THE EU: POLICIES, STRATEGIES, AND ORGANIZATION (2014, background): “The authors use the cultural dimensions developed by Hofstede et al. (2010) and correlate them with cooperative membership.”
Online Foreign Language Learning in Higher Education and Its Correlates during the COVID-19 Pandemic (2021, background): “…countries, Japan, Greece, Portugal, France etc.) exhibit certain behaviours: they are very likely to show higher levels of anxiety during the language classes, to feel uncomfortable and worried about what may happen in certain class situations and prefer to have a less active participation [61–63].”
Long-Term Orientation and Educational Performance (2019, methodology): “As a result, differences in educational performance could be related to differences in saving rates among immigrant groups and not directly related to differences in LTO, as higher savings may provide more resources for moving.”
Investigating the factors influencing the adoption of m-banking: A cross cultural study (2015, background): “In examining Hofstede et al (2010) cultural dimensions, it is revealed that Australia and Thailand present inherent national cultural differences (See Table 1).”
Customer involvement capability and service firm performance: The mediating role of innovation (2017, background): “The positive relationship between involvement capability and firm performance in Ghana may be explained by the fact that Ghana's culture emphasises collectivism (Hofstede, 1991) where they are more expressively motivated and hope to establish social relationships and place a high value on “touch” in”