The Influence of Board Composition on Sustainable Development Disclosure
By Mohammad I. Jizi. 2017
517 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Marketing, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8c0e3859956dee5f4f9c45112ae8dc038c42d252
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
In Marketing
- A. Gerged
- Abdelwahed Omri
- O. Yousfi
- Nadia Smaili
- Camélia Radu
- A. Cicchiello
- M. Atif
- Mohammed Hossain
In Strategy and Management
Citations in the corpus
- Composition and Activity of the Board of Directors: Impact on ESG Performance in the Banking System (2018, background): “However, while positive results are found by Barako and Brown [15], Jizi et al. [18] and Kiliç et al. [19], no significant linkage is shown by Hossain and Reaz [72].”
- Does board gender diversity affect renewable energy consumption? (2020, background): “Extant literature tends to focus on the impact of female directors on environmental CSR ratings (e.g., Post et al., 2011) and environmental disclosure (e.g., Williams, 2003; Liao et al., 2015; Jizi, 2017).”
- Environmental policy, environmental performance, and financial distress in China: Do top management team characteristics matter? (2018, background): “…firm’s social/environmental management and financial performance (Ben-Amar and Mcllkenny, 2015; Chang et al., 2015; Eleftheriadis and Anagnostopoulou, 2015; Galbreath, 2010, 2017; Haque and Ntim, 2017; Jizi, 2017; Lau et al., 2016; McGuinness et al., 2017; Ntim, 2016; Sullivan and Gouldson, 2017).”
- Corporate governance, law, culture, environmental performance and CSR disclosure: A global perspective (2020, unknown): “Empirical evidence in various countries show support of this positive relation, such as studies of firms in Australia (Galbreath, 2018), Germany (Horbach and Jacob, 2018; Velte, 2016), Spain (Pucheta-Martínez and Bel-Oms, 2018), United Kingdom (Jizi, 2017; Haque and Ntim, 2017; Al-Shaer and Zaman, 20”
- Board Diversity and Corporate Social Responsibility: Empirical Evidence from France (2020, result): “In line with the previous studies (Jizi 2017; Harjoto et al. 2015; Hafsi and Turgut 2013), we consider two dimensions of board diversity: (1) diversity of boards , assessed by structural characteristics of the board, such as size, duality structure and board independence, and (2) diversity in…”
- Alignment Versus Monitoring: An Examination of the Effect of the CSR Committee and CSR-Linked Executive Compensation on CSR Performance (2021, background): “We expect larger boards, which boast diversified experience and competencies, to be more efficient and enjoy better CSR outcomes (Jizi, 2017).”
- Factors affecting corporate environmental disclosure in emerging markets: The role of corporate governance structures (2020, methodology): “…results are consistent with those of prior CG-to-CED studies (e.g., Liao et al., 2015; Akbas, 2016; Trireksani and Djajadikerta, 2016; Wang, 2017; Jizi, 2017; Ezhilarasi and Kabra, 2017; Fernandes et al., 2019; Giannarakis et al., 2019), and robust to the form of CED indices applied (either EDI…”
- Sustainability Reporting and Firms’ Economic Performance: Evidence from Asia and Africa (2020, methodology): “Finally, following previous studies (Bear et al. 2010; Liao et al. 2015; Jizi 2017; Ben-Amar et al. 2017; Rosati and Faria 2019), we also consider the percentage of the female on the board of the company (FEMALE).”