A Systematic Review of Assessment Literacy Measures

106 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Reconceptualising the role of teachers as assessors: teacher assessment identity (2017, background): “Initial inter-rater agreement between the two raters was 75% for the 206 items from ten scales in Gotch and French (2014).”
What does it mean for teachers to be data literate: Laying out the skills, knowledge, and dispositions (2016, background): “Until recently, the field has paid more attention to assessment literacy (Brookhart, 2011; Christoforidou, Kyriakides, Antoniou, & Creemeers, 2013; Gotch & French, 2014; Kahl, Hofman, & Bryant, 2013; Mandinach, 2014; Plake, 1993) because of the emphasis on assessment results as the most salient…”
Approaches to Classroom Assessment Inventory: A New Instrument to Support Teacher Assessment Literacy (2016, methodology): “…the early 1990s (i.e., Standards for Teacher Competency in Educational Assessment of Students; American Federation of Teachers [AFT], National Council on Measurement in Education [NCME], & National Education Association [NEA], 1990; DeLuca, LaPointe-McEwan, & Luhanga, 2016; Gotch & French, 2014).”